My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-17-1990 CC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
09-17-1990 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:50:04 PM
Creation date
7/24/2018 7:45:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
9/17/1990
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
9/17/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
y <br /> Mounds View City Council - • <br /> 2 <br /> In her August 13, 1990 statement to the Community, the Mayor <br /> emphasized that the amount of money paid our departing Clerk <br /> Administrator was determined by a contract written by Mr. Pauley <br /> and executed by former Mayor Duane McCarty in 1984 . I am <br /> confident this statement was made with full knowledge that <br /> contractual agreements made on behalf of the city are consummated <br /> with the consent of the entire council and executed by the Mayor <br /> as a matter of administrative form required by the City Charter. <br /> As the Oct . 22, 1984 official minutes of the City Council show; <br /> the motion introducing the contract written by the <br /> Clerk/Administrator was made by then Councilmember Hankner, <br /> Seconded by then Councilmember Doty and received unanimous <br /> approval by the entire council. <br /> Question: <br /> If this contract tied the hands of this council in any way, why <br /> wasn' t there a revision in the past 6 years since it' s original <br /> adoption to account for changing times and needs of the City? <br /> The Mayor' s Aug. 13, 1990 statement also implied a difficulty in <br /> that the contract with Mr. Pauley did not contain a termination <br /> date nor renegotiation terms . <br /> The Clerk/Administrator is employed at the will and pleasure of <br /> the City Council. If termination of the contract is supportable, <br /> then such action simply takes the majority vote of the City <br /> Council . This is a very basic tenant of public administration. <br /> Question: <br /> What need has been identified that written authority would be any <br /> stronger than the unwritten understanding that the Council is the <br /> employer and as such has the power to dismiss employees when <br /> appropriate under termination authority? <br /> What further need has been identified to require renegotiation <br /> terms beyond the annual reviewal of the Clerk/Administrators <br /> performance and authorization of salary increases to reward <br /> faithful services rendered, or the termination of employment as <br /> noted above? <br /> The Mayor further stated in her Aug. 13, 1990 paper, and was also <br /> quoted in local news articles that the separation package given • <br /> the Clerk/Administrator was entirely required by the referenced <br /> employment contract . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.