My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1990/08/06
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Agenda Packets - 1990/08/06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:24 PM
Creation date
7/25/2018 5:46:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
8/6/1990
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
8/6/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. Mr. Don Pauley <br /> June 24, 1990 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 2) Whether the legislature indicates that the <br /> subject is a matter solely of state concern; and <br /> 3) Whether the subject matter is of such a nature <br /> that local regulation would have unreasonable adverse <br /> effects. <br /> Concerning factor one and two, Minnesota law on underground <br /> tanks has not been completely promulgated. The laws are currently <br /> due in draft form in June with a final draft anticipated in <br /> December of 1990 with full compliance not mandatory until 1991. <br /> Further, underground tank storage is not just of state concern, but <br /> also federal. <br /> The underground storage tank federal statute section 6991g <br /> entitled State Authority states: <br /> Nothing in this subchapter shall preclude or deny <br /> any right of any State or political subdivision thereof <br /> to adopt or enforce any regulation, requirement, or <br /> standard of performance respecting underground storage <br /> tanks that is more stringent than a regulation, <br /> requirement, or standard of performance in effect under <br /> this subchapter or to impose any additional liability <br /> with respect to the release of regulated substances <br /> within such State or political subdivision. <br /> Clearly, a state or a municipality may be more stringent and <br /> restrictive than the federal statute on underground storage tanks. <br /> My associate has had various telephone conversations with the <br /> Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Environmental Division of <br /> the Attorney General's Office and Region 5 headquarters of the <br /> Environmental Protection Agency. She spoke directly with Kristi <br /> Peterson of the Minnesota PCA Underground Tank Program. Ms. <br /> Peterson indicated that the PCA would not hold a municipal <br /> ordinance in conflict unless it was directly challenged. Attorney <br /> Barbara Freece of the Minnesota Attorney General 's Office indicated <br /> the Minnesota Underground Tank Program statutes were not drafted <br /> to be pre-emptive. Attorney Tom Kenney, Assistant Regional Counsel <br /> for the EPA, located in Chicago, stated he could not find a problem <br /> with a municipality being more strict in the cleaning and testing <br /> of underground storage tanks than the federal statute. <br /> Finally, from the information I have received, if you are <br /> . concerned about a particular request for a specific tank, a <br /> variance is all that is required to compel compliance. However, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.