Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br /> FROM: CLERK-ADMINISTRATOR <br /> DATE: MAY 22, 1990 <br /> SUBJECT: PROPOSED RESPONSES TO 1990 SURVEY RESULTS <br /> Staff has reviewed and discussed the results of the 1990 City <br /> Survey in an effort to develop a proposed set of responses. <br /> In some cases, e.g. Precinct 2's dissatisfaction with level of <br /> information on City, staff was unable to develop a specific <br /> response due to the lack of detailed reasons for the results. <br /> We have listed out by principal subject matter the responses <br /> we propose and would request Council direction. <br /> 1. Public Information/City Newsletter - Clearly there <br /> are groups of residents dissatisfied with the level of <br /> information they receive about the City. In two cases, <br /> these groups are made up of people (Precinct 2 and 6- <br /> 10 year residents) who are the largest readers of the <br /> City Newsletter. <br /> Suggested responses are, <br /> • a. More in-depth and timely information in the City <br /> Newsletter about property taxes, in particular, <br /> the City's share. <br /> b. "Did You Know?" articles in the City Newsletter on <br /> property taxes and the value of specific services <br /> provided by the City. <br /> c. Expanded efforts to report on current and future <br /> issues of importance in the Newsletter. <br /> d. A city brochure for new residents. <br /> e. Expanded efforts to reach out to apartment <br /> dwellers, particularly with recreation program <br /> information. <br /> f. An evaluation of the current City Newsletter <br /> delivery system be conducted on a random basis. <br /> g. Survey Precinct 3 residents using a return mail <br /> survey form to more accurately measure the level <br /> Newsletter readership and, if low, the reasons. <br /> 2 . Recycling - Continue efforts to provide recycling <br /> IIIcontainers as a means to encourage greater <br /> participation. The stated desire for more frequent <br />