My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1990/07/16
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Agenda Packets - 1990/07/16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:49:02 PM
Creation date
7/25/2018 5:58:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/16/1990
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/16/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
11% MEMO TO: COUNCILMEMBER QUICK WVM3 <br /> FROM: MARY SAARION, DIRECTOR <br /> PARKS, RECREATION AND FORESTRY <br /> DATE: JULY 11, 1990 <br /> SUBJECT: POP MACHINES <br /> I met with Mr. Parsons from Coca-Cola Bottling Company regarding the feasibility of <br /> pop machines in the park. I expressed my primary concern of vandalism. Mr. Parsons <br /> did not feel that vandalism would be a problem and stated that it would be the <br /> company at risk, not the City. <br /> After discussion of activities and use of various parks, Mr. Parsons recommended that <br /> one machine be placed under the large picnic shelter at City Hall and one at the new <br /> picnic shelter at Silver View. He suggested the six-select machine at $14.00/month. <br /> At $.50 per can and a minimum of 25 cases per month, at the two above locations, <br /> profits would be $375.00 for a 5 month operation period (May - September) per <br /> machine. <br /> I have reviewed this with the Parks and Recreation Commission and they expressed <br /> two concerns: <br /> 1. Who will be responsible for filling the pop machine and how often does it need <br /> • to be filled? I shared my opinion in reference to this question that the public <br /> works employees would be the logical ones to fill the pop machine during <br /> regular trash and facility inspection tasks. It was then the Commissions' <br /> question as to whether or not the public works has enough time to take on <br /> another task. <br /> 2. The concern about collecting money was expressed. Would money need to be <br /> collected every day; every two days? If money was stolen would it be the <br /> City's liability? Who would be responsible for collecting the money? <br /> Generally, the Commission wanted to be sure that any profits generated could <br /> compensate time spent to manage the tasks involved. <br /> I still am concerned about vandalism. Mr. Parsons did not know of any machines in <br /> area parks. I asked if Minneapolis parks or anywhere else in the metro area used <br /> their machines in parks. He was not aware of any, although, he said that most golf <br /> courses have pop machines. My basic concern is that even if we are not liable for any <br /> damage done to the machine, I am reluctant to give any more "opportunities", or <br /> enticements for vandals to be detrimental to park facilities. <br /> On the other hand, the pop machines do provide a service to the park users and may <br /> provide profit monies for additional park amenities. <br /> I would like to suggest that we try one machine at City Hall picnic shelter from May - <br /> September in 1991 on a trail basis to actually see the use and profit potential of a <br /> pop machine in the parks and evaluate the profit versus the cost of operating a pop <br /> machine service. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.