My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1990/07/02
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Agenda Packets - 1990/07/02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:48:45 PM
Creation date
7/25/2018 6:07:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
7/2/1990
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
7/2/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
+ t <br /> MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL <br /> PAGE TWO <br /> JUNE 12, 1990 <br /> The first purpose of this section is to eliminate <br /> claims that pay equity requires adjustments to male <br /> dominated or balanced classes. Local governments can <br /> still make these adjustments and, in fact, may have to <br /> make them to avoid violation of state human rights or <br /> federal civil rights legislation. In fact, considering <br /> that there is usually turnover with jobs and no way of <br /> predicting whether the job will be held by a male or <br /> female individual, it does not make sense that there <br /> has to be an adjustment in compensation depending upon <br /> whether a male or female is hired to fill a vacancy. <br /> The second purpose of this section is to prevent <br /> employers from adopting unreasonable positions in <br /> bargaining. In fact, another section of this Law <br /> attempts to address the issue of pay equity and <br /> collective bargaining but only addresses it with <br /> respect to balanced classes which are classes having a <br /> similar percentage of male and female individuals <br /> holding those positions. <br /> 3 . Implementation Report. - By January 31, 1992 each • <br /> political subdivision must submit to the Commissioner <br /> and implementation report containing current <br /> information describing the status of its work force <br /> with respect to implementation of pay equity. If a <br /> subdivision fails to submit a report, the Commissioner <br /> will find the subdivision not in compliance and will <br /> impose penalties including notifying the Commissioner <br /> of Revenue that the subdivision is subject to a 5% <br /> reduction in Local Government Aid or to a fine of $100 <br /> per day whichever is greater. <br /> 4. Penalties for Failure to Im•lement Plan. - , - <br /> Commissioner of the Department of Employee Relations <br /> will review the implementation report submitted by each <br /> jurisdiction and determine whether the governmental <br /> subdivision has equitable compensation relationships. <br /> If the Commissioner finds that the subdivision is not <br /> in compliance, the Commissioner must notify the <br /> subdivision of the basis for the finding. The notice <br /> must include a description of the basis for the <br /> finding, specific recommended actions to achieve <br /> compliance, and how much compliance would cost. The <br /> subdivision has the ability to appeal the determination <br /> of the Commissioner up to and including an appeal of a <br /> penalty to the Office of Administrative Hearings . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.