Laserfiche WebLink
SALARY STRUCTURE <br /> DEMO <br /> 1.6 <br /> M <br /> 1.5 - <br /> 411 • <br /> 1.4 - MM <br /> M <br /> 1.3 - M M M M M <br /> M M M <br /> M M M <br /> n F <br /> c 1.2 - FMo <br /> O. 7 M M <br /> 2 1.1 - F F M M M M F M <br /> FMMF MFM F F F M F FM F <br /> FF M <br /> 1 - F M M <br /> M <br /> 0.9 - M <br /> 0.8 - M <br /> 0.7 ' i t I i . I 1 1 1 i I 1 i 1 <br /> 1.5 1.54 1.58 1.62 1.66 1.7 1.74 1.78 <br /> (Thousands) <br /> POINTS <br /> 1.6 <br /> M <br /> 1.5 - <br /> • M <br /> 1.4 - M M <br /> 1.3 - MM M M M M <br /> M M n1a6lsac <br /> M M <br /> N F <br /> Yo 1.2 - FM <br /> a 3 <br /> 2 F F MMM MM F M fEM.I! It At. <br /> v i i M M F MEM F F F M F FM F <br /> FF <br /> 1 - F M <br /> 0.9 - <br /> 0.8 - <br /> 0.7 1111 t 11111111111 <br /> 1.5 1.54 1.58 1.62 1.66 1.7 1.74 1.78 <br /> (Thousands) <br /> POINTS <br /> 'Consistently Below" <br /> Although some M's mixed with F's, they are not enough to off-set large <br /> number of M's well above F's. This system fails three tests. <br /> 1. Two-line Test: When looking at male and female lines, large gap <br /> exists and gets worse. <br /> 2. Look-back Test: F's at the highest point level are paid less <br /> than large number of M's with fewer points. <br /> 3. Range Test: Nearly all females compensated alike while males <br /> show wide range and greater opportunity for higher compensation. <br /> Correction: Increase compensation for most F's to where they fall in <br /> the middle of the M's. <br />