My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-22-1990 CC
MoundsView
>
City Council
>
City Council
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
01-22-1990 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2018 6:25:34 AM
Creation date
7/25/2018 6:24:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
1/22/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 22, 190 <br /> Regular Meeting Page Eight <br /> City Planner Hren explained Phase III involves two <br /> different sites and she reviewed the plans for <br /> both. The Planning Commission has recommended <br /> conceptual and development stage approval of the <br /> east site only. The west site has many issues to <br /> be addressed still, and they are recommending the <br /> Council address the concept stage only. <br /> Tim Nelson, of Everest Development, reviewed what <br /> is planned, which will compliment Phases I and II. <br /> Approximately 21 acres is involved, and will con- <br /> sist of four buildings with a total of 330, 000 s. f. <br /> The rezoning would be to a PUD. They plan to <br /> develop the plans further within the next two <br /> weeks, discuss the access issues, present it to <br /> the Planning Commission on an informational basis, <br /> schedule a public informational meeting and get <br /> back on both the Planning Commission and City Council <br /> formal agendas for review and action. <br /> Helen Bailey, of County Road H2, questioned the <br /> access planned on County Road H2. <br /> Mr. Nelson reviewed the two planned accesses . They <br /> are planned for car traffic only, not truck traffic, <br /> based upon the successful acquisition of access with • <br /> Loose Ends. <br /> Ms . Bailey questioned why there couldn 't be a <br /> shared access with AT&T. She stated there is a <br /> problem with semi traffic already. <br /> Mr. Nelson pointed out the road was designed for <br /> heavy traffic, but they did not plan for truck use. <br /> He requested that any problems be called in direct- <br /> ly, so they can be dealt with. He added he wasn't <br /> aware prior to this of any problems with truck <br /> traffic. He added they cannot sign County Road II2 <br /> for no trucks as it is an MSA street. He also noted <br /> the City does not want signs posted internally. <br /> Mayor Hankner closed the public hearing and reopened <br /> the regular meeting at 9:14 PM. <br /> Motion/Second: Blanchard/Quick to approve Resolu- <br /> tion No. 2592, approving the concept/development stage, <br /> Mounds View Business Park Phase III (East) , Planning <br /> Case No. 287-89, and waive the reading. <br /> 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Motion/Second: Blanchard/Paone to table Resolution No . <br /> 2593 until there is more information on driveways and <br /> access and truck traffic. <br /> 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.