My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-20-1996 WS
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
02-20-1996 WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2025 4:46:31 PM
Creation date
7/25/2018 7:05:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
2/20/1996
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
2/20/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. ► <br /> • <br /> January 27, 1990 <br /> TO: Senators <br /> Representatives <br /> Local Officials <br /> FROM: AMM Staff <br /> SUBJECT: AMM Priority Policy Issues For 1990 <br /> Enclosed for your reference is a complete description of the <br /> 1990 addendum to the AMM Policy as adopted by the membership. <br /> We do wish to point out certain policy issues which are considered <br /> by our membership and Board of Directors to be of extreme high <br /> priority to the metropolitan area cities. <br /> Major High Priority Issues. <br /> 1. Comparable Worth. Pay equity plans and implementation are <br /> proceeding according to law. The AMM believes that no major <br /> changes should be initiated until results of current law can <br /> be evaluated. Prior to the December 31, 1991 implementation <br /> date, the Department of Employee Relations (DOER) should <br /> provide some statistical evaluation and data to be analyzed <br /> by a group made up of DOER personnel and local government, <br /> representatives. The analysis should look at compensation <br /> relationships in light of pay, pay ranges, outside forces <br /> such as binding arbitration and market conditions, etc. <br /> After careful analysis, a proposal should then be considered <br /> to define more succinctly the criteria to judge 'equitable <br /> compensation relationship' (Policy 90-26, pages 4-7) . <br /> 2. Land Use Planning. Recodification of the Land Use Planning <br /> Statutes has been proposed to update statutory language and <br /> combine city and county procedures. (HF 1654/SF 1510) . The <br /> AMM believes that current city land use planning procedures <br /> are appropriate and should not be modified substantially. <br /> The AMM does not support HF 1654/SF 1510 at this point in <br /> time. (Policy 90-33, pages 10-11) . <br /> 3 . Property Tax Reform. The AMM supports property tax reform <br /> measures that will provide relief to certain excessively high <br /> -1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.