Agenda Packets - 1990/04/23 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council April 23, 1990 Regular Meeting Page Seven 410The Council reviewed the list of policy decisions needing to be made at this time in order to proceed with the utility, and determined the name of the utility to be Surface Water Management Utility; no exemptions, other than the budgeted street right of way; no credits; basis of charges to be zoning; 2" rainfall for basis of charges; an appeal process would be allowed; and expenditures to include capital improvement projects, maintenance costs for cleaning sewers and ditches, street sweeping costs, personnel costs and administrative costs. Motion/Second: Quick/Blanchard to authorize Staff to enter into an agreement for services with Short, Elliott, Hendrickson for preparation of a final report on a surface water management utility and assistance for a public information program for the implementation of this utility, with the cost to be charged to account #420-4121-303. 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried Mayor Hankner noted the Council reviewed this at 14. Consideration "' the agenda session last week and had asked Staff of Variance to research how many lots in the City are Request Appeal similar. from Tom Plumb, 7359 Clerk/Administrator Pauley reviewed the memo from Park View City Planner Hren, detailing past variance requests. Terrace, He noted Mr. Plumb was required to set his house Planning Case 4' further back due to the curvature of the lot and No. 293-90 road. While Mr. Plumb is requesting a 511 ' variance, it would only be for 4' . Motion/Second: Paone/Quick to approve the setback variance for Tom Plumb, Resolution No. 3032, 7359 Park View Terrace, Planning Case No. 293-90, for a 52 ' variance, and waive the reading. 3 ayes 2 nays Motion Carried Councilmembers Blanchard and Wuori voted against the motion. Councilmember Quick stated he feels this situation is similar to that at 2833 Laport Drive, where a variance was issued. 410Councilmember Blanchard stated she had spent many years on the Planning Commission, and they are a very conscientious group. She added she could not support a 52 ' variance, but would be more agreeable to a 4' one.