My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 1990/04/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
Agenda Packets - 1990/04/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2025 3:09:12 PM
Creation date
7/25/2018 7:28:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/23/1990
Description
Regular and Special Meeting
Supplemental fields
City Council Document Type
City Council Packets
Date
4/23/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM `.. / . <br /> • <br /> TO: Mayor and City Council <br /> FROM: City Planner, Michelle Hren <br /> DATE: April 19, 1990 <br /> SUBJECT: Tom Plumb Variance Request <br /> Pictures taken of the applicants property located at 7359 Park View <br /> Terrace will be available at the meeting Monday night. The <br /> pictures show the relationship between the adjacent homes and the <br /> applicants home. <br /> Attached for your information is a list of variance requests that <br /> were heard by the Planning Commission. Variance requests,if <br /> approved, do not have to go to the City Council. The applicant has <br /> the right of appeal to the Council if the Planning Commission does <br /> not act in favor of the applicant. <br /> The Variance cases were all approved except for the ones noted. I <br /> 40 will point out that each case obviously has different circumstances <br /> and conditions. Some of the reasons stated in the resolutions were <br /> that the lot was on a cul-de-sac and therefore was required to be <br /> setback further than their neighbors, the setbacks of the <br /> surrounding properties, not enough room to do what they wanted, <br /> the original plan called for an addition. Some of the reasons for <br /> denying requests were that the condition was self created, there <br /> were reasonable alternatives and there was no hardship on the <br /> property. I could not find that the cases that had been denied <br /> appealed to the Council for relief, therefore the Planning <br /> Commission resolutions were used. <br /> In any case the attached Resolution approves and denies the <br /> requested variance. There is space to add City Council findings on <br /> your action. Whatever your action may be it would be in the best <br /> interest of the City to thoroughly document your findings so that <br /> a precedent either for or against this request is defendable. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.