Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is now in its 16th year. During <br /> relatively short existence, the Association has experienced many diffi-. <br /> •its <br /> culties and challenges. Examples include the 1976 Metropolitan Land Planning <br /> Act and the more recent debates over local government aid. <br /> Despite predictions for the demise for general purpose organizations like <br /> the Association, the AMM is now at an all-time high of 68 member cities, repre- <br /> senting over 90 percent of the population in the seven-county metropolitan area. <br /> The cities of the region apparently believe that they are getting a good value <br /> for their membership dollars. <br /> However, despite the successes of the past, the twelve members of this years <br /> Mission and Membership Services Task Force have concluded that this is no time <br /> to rest on our laurels. We face challenges from other city lobbying groups <br /> whose interests are contrary to those of the metropolitan area, as well as a <br /> generally hostile attitude by the State legislature toward cities. At the same <br /> time, the complexity of governing the metropolitan area is increasing geometri- <br /> cally, meaning that it is more important than ever to work together if we are to <br /> effectively serve the citizens of our respective communities. <br /> The Task Force concludes that in order to remain viable and relevant, the AMM <br /> must become more proactive, more collaborative, more focused and more assertive. <br /> The AMM provides the only meaningful vehicle for the cities of the metropoli- <br /> tan area to express in a united voice-the important perspective of local govern- <br /> ment. The issues at stake are simply too important to abandon the playing field <br /> and leave all the important decisions to others. <br /> Association was originally formed out of several metropolitan area splinter <br /> •The <br /> groups who had originally felt that they had little in common, but came to <br /> realize that the things they did have in common were far more than those that <br /> divided them. The challenges of today are certainly no less thanthose that <br /> faced our cities in the past. Our test will be whether we can continue to be an <br /> effective voice for the collective interests of the cities in this metropolitan <br /> area, and to pass that test will require two things: <br /> 1. A renewed ability and commitment to come together through our com- <br /> mittees and 19-member Board of Directors to reach a consensus on <br /> the critical issues that face us. <br /> 2. The ability to effectively, and with a united front, promote the <br /> policies we do adopt to the Governor, the legislature, the <br /> Metropolitan Council and the regional operating agencies. <br /> The Mission and Membership Services Committee feels that the recommendations <br /> set forth in this report will set us well on a course to accomplishing just <br /> that. We commend it for your consideration and thoughtful action. <br /> 110 <br /> - 16 - <br />