My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-03-1986
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
09-03-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 6:46:24 AM
Creation date
7/26/2018 6:46:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
9/3/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Mounds View Planning Commission September 3, 198E <br /> Regular Meeting Page Five <br /> • <br /> • Motion/Second: Forslund/Mountin to approve Resolution <br /> No. 1.70-86. <br /> 2 ayes 2 nays Motion Fails <br /> Chairman Mountin stated she had seconded the motion to <br /> make sure it would not die, and to allow for a vote. She <br /> stated that she voted against the motion because the <br /> finding of uniqueness is not sufficient to support total <br /> waiving of the open space requirement. <br /> Commissioner Zollner stated she voted against the motion <br /> as she does not feel there is a demonstrated hardship <br /> to allow for a variance on the open space requirement. <br /> Chairman Mountin advised the applicant that they could <br /> appeal the denial to the Council. She added that once <br /> the variance issue has been resolved, the rest of the <br /> project can be addressed. <br /> Director Thatcher advised they could appeal at the <br /> September 15 agenda session, and he requested a letter <br /> from Dynamic Designers, if they wished to appeal <br /> the denial . <br /> Chairman Mountin clarified that at their last official <br /> 411 meeting, they had stated they could approve it without <br /> further variances , if it could be accomplished, but <br /> there were new variance requests involved tonight. <br /> Tim Nelson, of JLN Development, introduced the group 8. JLN Develop- <br /> of people with him. Iie stated that since they last ment, Pine- <br /> met with the Planning Commission, they have decided crest Proper . <br /> they do want to go ahead with a PUD, and they have <br /> reviewed Mounds View' s PUD ordinance and prepared the <br /> application. Mr. Nelson reviewed the development <br /> conceit •lan, and stated the antici.ate a four ear <br /> build-out on the project. <br /> Mr. Nelson reviewed the progress they have made on <br /> the checklist the Commissioners had given to Staff <br /> at their last meeting, and he introduced the traffic <br /> consultant they have hired, Mr. Jim Benshaw. <br /> Mr. Benshaw reported he is in the process of preparing <br /> a comprehensive traffic study of the area and all <br /> roadways that would potentially be affected by this <br /> development. He added they plan to have the full <br /> report completed by the September 15 Planning <br /> Commission agenda session. <br /> • iai.rman Mountin stated that the timetable that has <br /> Jeen prepared should include a time when the Planning <br /> Commission can meet with the residents of the adjacent <br /> properties in an in '!orthational meeting, before the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.