Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 3, 1987 <br /> Regular Meeting Page Two <br /> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> Motion/Second: Saunders/Miller to adopt Resolution No. <br /> 188-87, recommending approval to the City Council of <br /> Mounds View Planning Case 208-87 , Greg Johnson, 2865 <br /> Trunk Highway 10 rezoning from R1 single family <br /> residential to RO residential office. <br /> 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> It was noted there was no one present to represent 7. Consideration <br /> the applicant. of Rslt. No. <br /> 189-87 , Planning <br /> Motion/Second: Miller/Saunders to adopt Resolution Case 209-87 , <br /> No. 189-87, recommending approval to the City Council Larry Pearson, <br /> of a conditional use permit to construct an accessory 2925 Highway 10 <br /> building for Larry Pearson, 2925 Trunk Highway 10 , <br /> Planning Case No. 209-87 . <br /> 4 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Clerk/Administrator Pauley passed out revised site 8. Continuation <br /> plans to the Commissioners for their review. of Discussion <br /> on Mounds View <br /> Councilmember Wuori arrived at 7 : 55 PM. Planning Case <br /> No. 211-87, <br /> Chairman Mountin expressed concern that there were not Silverview <br /> enough parking spaces allowed for, or enough room to Plaza <br /> add additional spaces if the need arises. <br /> Clerk/Administrator Pauley explained that in the past <br /> the City has made exceptions on the parking requirements, <br /> and the City Attorney has advised it is alright to do <br /> so. He added that this proposed development is a PUD, <br /> which does allow for it. <br /> Chairman Mountin suggested that rather than making <br /> allowances on the parking, they should review the code <br /> and change the code, if that is what is required. <br /> Tore Wistrom, of Kraus/Anderson Development Corporation, <br /> explained they had researched nine surrounding <br /> communities for their parking requirements, and found <br /> them all to be less restrictive. He added New Brighton <br /> is in the process of restructuring theirs to be there <br /> lenient that it now. He explained they do not feel <br /> the parking will present a problem on this site . <br /> The Planning Commission discussed the possibility of <br /> moving the access point to the property to meet code, <br /> but of the potential for problems with angles, or <br /> • <br /> possibly having it connect onto the Super America <br /> property and using a combined entrance/exit. <br />