Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 229-88 <br /> PAGE THREE <br /> WHEREAS, Chapter 48.06, Subd . 4 (3) requires that following <br /> information as part of the wetland alteration permitting process : <br /> 1 . The time period for commencement and completion of the <br /> development including time for staging of development, <br /> if applicable . <br /> 2 . Design specification and plan for all sediment and <br /> erosion control measures as well as all grading and <br /> drainage appertenances and practices ; and <br /> WHEREAS, the developer has not provided the required <br /> information such as the location of the temporary road nor the <br /> time period for the commencement of the development including <br /> time periods for staging; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission would recommend denial of <br /> the wetland alteration permit based on the insufficient <br /> information on the revised phosphorus calculations and on the <br /> construction timing and temporary haul road; and <br /> WHEREAS, the developer has requested a variance from the <br /> • minimum lot size-20, 000 square feet and minimum lot width-125 <br /> feet as measured at the building setback line and the 100 foot <br /> setback; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and Staff have reviewed <br /> this request and found that there are no exceptional or <br /> extraordinary circumstances which apply to the properties which <br /> do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone or <br /> vicinity and result from lot size or shape, topography or other <br /> circumstances over which the owners of the property, since <br /> enactment of this Code, have had no control ; and <br /> WHEREAS, furthermore , the Planning Commission and Staff <br /> has found that the request is not the minimum variance which <br /> would alleviate the hardship; economic conditions alone shall not <br /> be considered a hardship; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission would recommend denial of <br /> the variance requests for lot size, lot width and the 100 foot <br /> setback; and <br /> WHEREAS, the developer has requested a conditional use <br /> permit for working in a flood plain; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City's engineering consultant has reviewed <br /> • the development proposal and found no adverse affect upon the <br /> flood plain; and <br />