Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 22, 1988 <br /> Special Meeting Page Three <br /> • have an option to use that as a measure for a proposed <br /> development. He added that the questions of how it <br /> would calculate to a critical storm event needs to be <br /> evaluated. <br /> He also stated the Planning Commission needs to address <br /> what method would be used and how the standard would be <br /> applied. <br /> Mr . Merila stated the existing method does not provide <br /> an adequate manner of calculating phosphorus stripping, <br /> and a better method is needed. <br /> Kay Weseman, no address given, asked if there was <br /> another approach to improving phosphorus stripping in a <br /> wetland. <br /> Mr. Borovsky stated he would be surprised if state of the <br /> art phosphorus calculations didn' t show the proposed <br /> development would result in improved phosphorus stripping <br /> capacity. He added that while that gives an indication of <br /> the direction the development would proceed, it does not <br /> provide a test of whether it would be good enough or not. <br /> He stated the language in the ordinance now is what the <br /> test would be. <br /> • City Planner Herman stated they are trying to help the <br /> City Council decide what direction they want to go, and <br /> the issue is both how to get the end result, what model <br /> to use as well as the end result itself. <br /> Mr. Sabee expressed concern with the total picture and <br /> its implications, stating they need a standard that <br /> will look at all cases and protect the intent of the <br /> ordinance in all cases without necessarily approving <br /> the development. <br /> Mr. Merila stated he feels there is a better technical <br /> method of calculating phosphorus than what is currently <br /> being judged, and if Barr has another method, they have <br /> no problem complying with that versus the Walker <br /> Method. Mr. Merila reviewed his letter of June 22, in <br /> response to the June 17 letter from Barr Engineering. <br /> City Planner Herman reviewed proposed Resolution No. <br /> 229-88 with the Planning Commission. She stated that <br /> regardless of whether the development is approved, she <br /> would recommend the Coucnil address the proposed change <br /> to the wetland boundaries and bring the wetland map <br /> current . <br /> • There was discussion among the Commissioners regarding <br /> setting standards for phosphorus stripping. City Planner <br /> Herman read from portions of the ordinance and questioned <br /> whether the Planning Commission was already setting standards, <br /> and she advised recommending to the Council that they look at <br /> the standard rather than giving a definitive recommendation. <br />