Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 245-89 <br /> CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br /> COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A REZONING REQUEST <br /> FOR 2625 HIGHWAY 10, PTW INVESTMENT, <br /> PLANNING CASE NO. 260-89 <br /> WHEREAS, PTW Investment has applied to rezone the property <br /> located at 2625 Highway 10, legally known as Lots 78, 79 and 80, <br /> Spring Lake Park Hillview Addition, from R-3, Medium Density <br /> Residential and B-4, High Density Residential to B-3, Highway <br /> Business District; and <br /> WHEREAS, Chapter 40. 25, Subdivision A(5) , provides that <br /> the Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects <br /> of the proposed amendment or conditional use. Its judgement <br /> shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors : <br /> 1 ) Relationship to municipal Comprehensive Plan. <br /> 2 ) The geographical area involved. <br /> 3 ) Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate <br /> the area in which it is proposed. <br /> • 4) The character of the surrounding area. <br /> 5 ) The demonstrated need for such use. <br /> WHEREAS, the rezoning request is inconsistent with the <br /> City' s Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation for this property <br /> which is high density residential; and <br /> WHEREAS, a B-3 development on this property would be <br /> directly adjacent to residential property on the north and east <br /> and at a location where access would be required on a residential <br /> street, Eastwood Road, as well as at an intersection already <br /> experiencing heavy traffic loads, namely County Road I and <br /> Highway 10; and <br /> WHEREAS, the proposal has been submitted to the City in <br /> order to allow the property owners to sell the property and no <br /> development is currently before the Planning Commission or City <br /> Council for their consideration. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View <br /> Planning Commission recommends denial of this request because of <br /> the following: <br /> • (1 ) The proposed zoning does not conform with the <br /> Comprehensive Land Use Plan. <br />