Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 20, 1990 <br /> Regular Meeting Page Two <br /> • Ms. Hren reviewed the request of the applicant for a 7 . Consideration <br /> conditional use permit to allow an oversized accessory of Resolution <br /> building on his property located at 8305 Fairchild. No. 295-90 <br /> The zoning ordinance allows a 216 square foot Regarding <br /> accessory building, but with a conditional use permit Conditional <br /> up to 400 square feet in area is allowed. The pro- Use Permit <br /> possed building is 264 square feet, which is Request, Dennis <br /> within the allowable square footage for this type Richter, 8305 <br /> of building. Fairchild Ave- <br /> nue, Planning <br /> It was noted the applicant was not present. Case No. 301-90 <br /> Motion/Second: Jones/Colleen to adopt Resolution <br /> No. 295-90 recommending approval of the request by <br /> Dennis Richter for a conditional use .:permit to allow <br /> an oversized accessory building on his property at <br /> 8305 Fairchild Avenue, Planh±ng Case No. 301-90, <br /> and waive the reading. <br /> 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Chair Mountin directed Staff to advise the applicant <br /> of when he will be scheduled with the Council, for <br /> both their agenda session and the public hearing. <br /> • Ms. Hren reviewed the request of the applicant 8. Consideration <br /> for a variance from the driveway setback require- of Resolution <br /> ment to allow a new driveway to be approximately 2 No. 296-90, <br /> feet from the property line. The property is lo- Variance Re- <br /> cated at 5379 Raymond Avenue and is zoned R-1, quest, Robert <br /> single family residential . Mr. Vandeveer, the Vandeveer, <br /> applicant, has removed the paved driveway and is 5379 Raymond <br /> requesting he be allowed to replace the driveway Avenue, <br /> in the same location. It was noted that if the Planning Case <br /> applicant had improved the surface without first No. 303-90 <br /> having the existing paving removed, a variance <br /> would not have been required. Ms. Hren reported <br /> the neighbors have indicated they would prefer to <br /> have the paved surface as opposed to crushed rock. <br /> Raymond Vandeveer, brother of the applicant, was <br /> noted as present. <br /> Motion/Second: Mountin/Jones to take this item <br /> off the agenda, as a variance is not required, <br /> due to grandfathered conditions, and recommend <br /> the contractor be assessed double fees for not <br /> taking out a permit before beginning work, and <br /> the additional fees are not to be passed on to <br /> the property owner. <br /> 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />