Laserfiche WebLink
• PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br /> RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> September 5, 1990 <br /> Mounds View City Hall <br /> 2401 Hwy. 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 <br /> The Mounds View Planning Commission was called to order 1 . Call to <br /> by Chair Mountin at 7:42 PM on Wednesday, September 5, Order <br /> 1990. <br /> MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Burgers, Peterson, 2. Roll Call <br /> Zollner, Colleen and Chair Mountin. <br /> It was noted Commissioners Jones and Miller were <br /> absent, with excused absences. <br /> ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Engineer Troy Gamble and <br /> Councilmember Wuori . <br /> Motion/Second: Burgers/Zollner to approve the 3. Approval of <br /> • July 18, 1990 minutes as presented, and the August Minutes: <br /> 1, 1990 minutes as amended. July 18, 1990 <br /> and August <br /> 5 ayes 0 nays 1, 1990 <br /> Motion Carried <br /> There were no residents requests or comments from 4. Residents <br /> the floor. Requests and <br /> Comments from <br /> the Floor <br /> Chair Mountin ti noted the request for a minor subdivi- 5. Consideration <br /> sion for Marian Winther, 2801 Woodcrest Drive, had of Rslt . No. <br /> been discussed with the applicant at the last agenda 300-90 Regarding <br /> session. Since that time, however, the issue has Minor Subdivi- <br /> been raised of whether the applicant would be able sion Request <br /> to meet the rear yard setback requirement with the by Marian <br /> proposed subdivision. Winther, 2801 <br /> Woodcrest Drive, <br /> Discussion ensued concerning where the front yard Planning Case <br /> of the subdivided property would be, as typically No. 308-90 <br /> the address is on the front property line, which is <br /> 0 the shortest property line. In that case, the <br /> address and front of the property would change to <br /> Silver Lake Road with the subdivision, even though <br /> the house would continue to face Woodcrest Drive. <br /> If the front property line remains where it is, <br /> the subdivided property would not meet the rear <br /> yard setback requirement of 30 ' and thus would <br />