Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission July 1, 1992 <br /> • Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> Motion/Second: Burgers/Colleen to table <br /> consideration of this case and to con- <br /> tinue discussion at the July 15, 1992 <br /> Agenda Session. <br /> 7 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Commissioner Burgers asked Ms. Madison <br /> if she had made any effort to resolve <br /> the complaints about her dogs with her <br /> neighbors. <br /> Ms. Madison said that she had not done <br /> this. She also stated that her dogs <br /> weren't the only dogs running in the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> Chair Mountin asked if the Community <br /> Service Officer (CSO) could go to the <br /> site to comment on the adequacy of <br /> control measures. <br /> • Commissioner Stevenson also wanted the <br /> CSO to address the issue of the size of <br /> the yard relative to the number and size <br /> of the dogs contained within it. <br /> Planner Harrington expressed concern <br /> over having the CSO make a value judge- <br /> ment on this case. He explained that <br /> the CSO is an enforcement official who <br /> can only demand that codes be followed. <br /> She can, however, go to the site to <br /> inspect its physical condition. <br /> The final item, Planning Case No. 347- 7. Consideration <br /> 92, request for Conditional Use Permit of Resolution <br /> for an oversized accessory building at No. 342-92, <br /> 7074 Knollwood Drive, was reviewed by Regarding <br /> Planner Harrington. The applicants plan Conditional Use <br /> to build a new garage and use the Permit Request <br /> existing 216 foot garage as a shed. for Oversized <br /> Accessory <br /> The applicants, Patrick and Cathy Building at <br /> Stampfle, were present. They indicated 7074 Knollwood <br /> that they were aware that they would Drive <br /> need to move the existing driveway <br /> . surface and that they could not store <br /> motorized vehicles in the building once <br /> it was converted to a shed. <br />