My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-04-1993
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
08-04-1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 10:35:51 AM
Creation date
7/26/2018 10:35:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
8/4/1993
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission August 4, 1993 <br /> •egular Meeting Page 2 <br /> future use of the church would be after <br /> it is sold - would it continue to be <br /> used as a church or would it be sold for <br /> residential lots? <br /> Mr. Bayer replied that the question of <br /> future use is still up in the air. <br /> There is a church that is very inter- <br /> ested in buying the property, but Church <br /> Upon The Rock has been unable to sell it <br /> until they have a new location. There <br /> is the also the possibility of inter- <br /> esting the Senior Center Task Force in <br /> the property, although the church has <br /> not yet approached this group. <br /> Commissioner Nelson asked if the <br /> temporary classroom would have to be <br /> removed if another school or church <br /> bought the property. <br /> Chair Mountin answered that if the <br /> • building is used in the same manner for <br /> which the Conditional Use Permit was <br /> granted, the building could remain until <br /> the July 1994 deadline. <br /> Commissioner Peterson commented that any <br /> buyer could potentially turn this church <br /> into residential lots. Perhaps requir- <br /> ing the church to pave their driveway <br /> and parking lot is the wrong path to <br /> take in this case? <br /> Pastor Steck asked if the Commission <br /> would consider requiring the paving only <br /> if the property is sold to another <br /> church. <br /> Chair Mountin replied that she would <br /> prefer that the pavement be required <br /> now. A change in use is not likely, and <br /> even if the use were to be converted to <br /> residential, the entire lot will need to <br /> be razed anyway. <br /> Commissioner Colleen arrived at 7:50 <br /> p.m. <br /> • Discussion ensued regarding the date by <br /> which these improvements must take <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.