Laserfiche WebLink
Funds View Planning Commission September 1, 1993 <br /> gular Meeting Page 2 <br /> subject to a one year review. Planner <br /> Harrington replied that the one year <br /> review provision is usually reserved for <br /> commercial uses, but that revocation of <br /> the permit would occur if violations <br /> were noted. <br /> Motion/Second: Nelson/Colleen to <br /> approve Resolution No. 366-93 , <br /> recommending approval of a Conditional <br /> Use Permit for an oversized accessory <br /> building at 8368 Spring Lake Road. <br /> 5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Tom Boulay of Husky, Inc. , gave the 6. Consideration <br /> presentation of this case. After the of Resolution <br /> Planning Commission denied a variance No. 367-93 , <br /> for this car wash, this alternative plan Regarding <br /> was designed. It meets all applicable Conditional Use <br /> setback rules - now a Conditional Use Permit Request <br /> Permit is needed. for a <br /> Prefabricated <br /> • Chair Mountin requested that Planner Car Wash at <br /> Harrington read Chapter 40.25 subd. C on 2390 Highway <br /> the requirements for a Conditional Use 10, Planning <br /> Permit. Case No. 362-93 <br /> Commissioner Miller asked how cars would <br /> exit the property from the car wash. <br /> Keith Carlson, of Gateway Foods, <br /> answered that the cars would have the <br /> option of exiting onto Highway 10, <br /> Greenfield Avenue, or County Road H2 . <br /> Commissioner Colleen asked about how the <br /> stacking would be handled - would the <br /> entrance to Highway 10 be blocked? <br /> Planner Harrington stated that staff had <br /> the applicant plan for about 1/2 hour <br /> worth of washes, or about six cars. <br /> These may block the Highway 10 entrance, <br /> although this can be alleviated somewhat <br /> by striping (such as Phillips 66 has <br /> done) . <br /> Chair Mountin asked about how the water <br /> • drainage would be addressed - would an <br /> additional water pump be needed? <br />