My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-06-1994
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
07-06-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 10:42:35 AM
Creation date
7/26/2018 10:42:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
7/6/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission July 6, 1994 <br /> •Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Planning Harrington reminded the 6 . Consideration <br /> Planning Commission that this item had of Resolution <br /> been discussed at their June 15th Agenda No. 390-94 <br /> Session. He reviewed Resolution No. Regarding <br /> 390-94 reading aloud the contingencies Conditional Use <br /> stated therein. He also informed the Permit Request <br /> Planning Commission that the applicant of Rodney & <br /> would be required to submit a Victoria <br /> Certificate of Survey showing side yard Schultz, 5505 <br /> setbacks. Quincy Street, <br /> Planning Case <br /> Motion/Second: Miller/Johnston to No. 382-94 <br /> approve Resolution No. 390-94 , <br /> recommending approval of the conditional <br /> use permit request of Rodney and <br /> Victoria Schultz, 5505 Quincy Street. <br /> 6 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br /> Planner Harrington reviewed this case 7 . Consideration <br /> and explained that the applicant, Harold of Resolution <br /> Ihnot, was requesting a variance to No. 391-94 <br /> allow for a second driveway for health Regarding <br /> reasons. Variance <br /> Request of <br /> The Planning Commission discussed the Harold Ihnot, <br /> contingencies that would be included in 7900 Greenfield <br /> the resolution. It was the consensus of Avenue, <br /> the Planning Commission that the Planning Case <br /> variance shall become null and void 10 No. 384-84 <br /> years after its adoption, a copy shall <br /> be recorded with Ramsey County, and the <br /> width of the driveway shall not exceed <br /> 12 feet. It was also noted that the <br /> property owner would be responsible for <br /> the removal of the driveway upon <br /> expiration of the Sunset clause. <br /> Planner Harrington distributed the <br /> proposed resolution to the Planning <br /> Commission. <br /> Motion/Second: Stevenson/Colleen to <br /> 411 approve Resolution No. 391-94 , <br /> recommending approval of the variance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.