Laserfiche WebLink
411 Mounds View Planning Commission September 4, 1996 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> Dimensional Requirements for the Development <br /> Review: lot area, lot width, building height, <br /> side building setbacks, rear building setbacks, <br /> parking lot setbacks, parking space requirements& <br /> maximum compact car spaces allowed. The four spaces <br /> which previously were proposed to be compact spaces <br /> for a total of seven, are fractions from ordinance requirements. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson commented that he would like to <br /> save any questions he may have until the next meeting as he, <br /> along with the other commissioners and staff, had just received <br /> copies of the new proposal and he has not had adequate time to <br /> determine if the questions they had have all been addressed <br /> satisfactorily. <br /> A discussion followed in regard to the time limits established by <br /> State Law as to the length of time allowed between the <br /> submittal of a proposal to the decision date. The normal limit is <br /> • 60 days, which can be extended by the city at its discretion for an <br /> additional 60 days. If no decision is made by the City Council by <br /> then, it is considered approved with no action taken. The applicant can <br /> determine if they want to extend the time. Ms. Sheldon noted that <br /> 60 days from the date of the application(July 15, 1996)would be <br /> September 12, 1996. The applicant has been sent a letter notifying them <br /> that the City is extending the review time for an additional 60 days or <br /> to November 11. <br /> Mr. Long, City Attorney, noted that the criteria under 1106.04 noted <br /> that the front yard setback can be no less than 35 feet. The applicant <br /> is providing only a 30 foot setback. He wondered if the church would <br /> be able to be built to comply with the 35 foot front setback requirements. <br /> Mr. Diem noted that the church could be built with a 35 foot front yard <br /> setback, however the buffer on the north would need to <br /> be adjusted down to five feet(this buffer area was a point <br /> of discussion at the last Planning Commission meeting and <br /> the proposal was based upon input from that discussion). <br /> Commissioners Johnston noted that at the last meeting, input <br /> from residents resulted in the Commissioners feelings that a <br /> 10 foot buffer would provide a better buffer to those <br />