Laserfiche WebLink
• Mounds View Planning Commission April 16, 1997 <br /> Special Meeting Page 3 <br /> the City. Director Sheldon explained that there are 12 planning districts in the <br /> Comprehensive Plan which are separate from the TIF districts. <br /> Motion Carried: 6 ayes, 0 nays <br /> 6. <br /> Planning Case No. 471-97 <br /> 2430 Highway 10 <br /> Applicant: Anthony Properties Management, Inc. <br /> Request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from Medium Density Residential to <br /> Mixed Use PUD Allowing Commercial and Office Uses, and Rezoning from B-1 and R-2 to <br /> PUD to Allow Development of a 16-Screen Movie Theater and Three 11,000 Square Foot <br /> Office Buildings. <br /> Mr. Wendell Smith and Mr. Jay Anthony, representing the applicant, Anthony <br /> • Properties Management, Inc., were present. <br /> Director Sheldon explained that the Planning Commission has two actions <br /> before it; the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive plan and a request for <br /> a rezoning from B-1 and R-2 to PUD for commercial uses. <br /> She began with the Comprehensive Plan amendment and indicated that the <br /> City's Code does not have specific procedures for Comp Plan amendments. <br /> She indicated that staff created a set of criteria that the Planning Commission <br /> could use to determine whether or not the designation on the property should be <br /> changed. She indicated that there have been a series of attempts to amend the <br /> Comp Plan and that there has been a range of designations considered <br /> including highway commercial, mixed use, low and medium density residential, <br /> office park, corporate headquarters office, or townhomes. The decision before <br /> the Planning Commission was whether or not to recommend to City Council to <br /> change the medium density residential designation to mixed use that would <br /> anticipate both commercial or residential uses. She read aloud the five goals <br /> noted on Pages 2 and 3 of Resolution No. 502-97. She noted as a general <br /> comment that this particular project and the Comp Plan amendment have raised <br /> several important issues: One is whether or not you can introduce a fairly <br /> intense commercial development onto a piece of land that is bordered by a major <br /> highway but also bordered by a low density single family neighborhood. Staff <br /> proposed that the designation make it clear that a portion of the property is <br />