My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-1997
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
05-21-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 11:29:35 AM
Creation date
7/26/2018 11:29:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
5/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 1997 <br /> • <br /> Regular Meeting Page 4 <br /> Commissioner Brasaemle questioned the height of the proposed garage and <br /> questioned the maximum height requirement of 15 feet. Director Sheldon <br /> explained that the 15 feet maximum is measured to a point halfway up the peak, <br /> based on the definition for building height. <br /> Motion Carried: 7 ayes, 0 nays <br /> The Planning Commission continued to discuss the amendments to the stipulations <br /> contained in the resolution. <br /> The applicant was informed that the City Council would be considering this case on <br /> June 9, 1997, at which time a public hearing would be held. <br /> 5. <br /> Planning Case No. 481-97 <br /> 7765 Spring Lake Road <br /> Applicant: Noel Barragan <br /> . Request for a Conditional Use Permit for an oversized garage (1,180 square feet). <br /> The applicants, C. R. and Noel Barragan, were present. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson explained that the applicant is requesting a conditional <br /> use permit to construct an oversized garage (1,180 square feet) located at 7765 <br /> Spring Lake Road. He added that the dimensions of the garage will be 36 feet by <br /> 32 feet and would take 7.1 percent of the area of the lot (not including the property <br /> that extends across the street and under a portion of Spring Lake). <br /> The Planning Commission was concerned with the two curb cuts on the property. <br /> The applicant responded that the double curb cut is aesthetically pleasing and <br /> would rather not remove one of them. Director Sheldon added that perhaps this <br /> issue could be worked out when Spring Lake Road is reconstructed in 1998. The <br /> Code allows for homeowners to apply for a variance to keep two driveways and a <br /> possible justification in this case could be a site distance problem because the <br /> property is on a curve. <br /> The Planning Commission discussed the amendments to the stipulations contained <br /> in the resolution. <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.