My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-21-1997
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
05-21-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 11:29:35 AM
Creation date
7/26/2018 11:29:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
5/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Mounds View Planning Commission May 21, 1997 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 8 <br /> was put into place in order to put some controls on what happens in the wetlands. <br /> He recalled that in the past some development had been allowed in the buffer, but <br /> that it was primarily intended to be a buffer and not for intensive development. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson added that the reason for the buffer was to make sure <br /> any development proposed for the wetland was reviewed. Commissioners Miller <br /> and Johnston expressed their concern with the difference in wetland delineations <br /> shown on the maps for 1988 and 1992 and asked if 1997 would also be different. <br /> Mr. Black indicated that he believed the 1992 delineation would be acceptable to <br /> Rice Creek Watershed District because it was not more than five years old. Mr. <br /> Black asked if he could receive a copy of a letter the City received from the Army <br /> Corps of Engineers regarding this issue. He indicated that if the Army Corps of <br /> Engineers is suggesting that a new delineation be done, they would have it looked <br /> at and verified. Commissioner Brasaemle expressed that he does prefer to see <br /> buildings versus parking lots constructed in the buffer zone because of the <br /> associated problems with run-off. He also expressed some concern with the <br /> location of the proposed NURP (National Urban Run-Off Program) in the wetland <br /> and where in the upland could it be moved if needed. <br /> • Chuck Plow, Project Engineer, reported that the information he has regarding the <br /> NURP pond indicates that it is not in the wetland, yet if they were not able to use it <br /> as a NURP pond area, the other NURP pond on the site would satisfy ponding <br /> requirements. <br /> Barb McKenzy, 2463 Ridge Lane, expressed her concern with the number of gas <br /> stations and car washes in Mounds View and inquired if the senior complexes in <br /> the area were being filled. <br /> Jim Miller, 7980 Fairchild Avenue, expressed his concern with the NURP pond <br /> _ ._ ... e .- . ... -. -. . . . .. . • <br /> Peterson replied that he believes the elevation to be similar to the ground floor <br /> elevation at Silver Lake Pointe on the south side of the project which also has <br /> underground parking. Mr. Miller also expressed his concern with the traffic flow on <br /> the corner of Silver Lake Road and Highway 10. <br /> Bill Smith, Transportation Planner for Biko Associates, addressed the traffic <br /> and stacking concerns by briefly summarizing the plan and the results of the traffic <br /> study that was conducted for this proposed project. He described the design of the <br /> loop road and driveway access to the gas station/car wash facility and indicated <br /> that the County Engineer, Dan Solar's, opinion was that the loop road is important <br /> to the project. He informed the Commission that a sign would be placed on the site <br /> • to inform car wash traffic to not block the driveway and that on-site staff for the car <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.