My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-18-1998 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
02-18-1998 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:02:36 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:02:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
2/14/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 1998 <br /> • Special Meeting Page 11 <br /> property for his development?" He said he did not have a good answer for this question <br /> and probably wouldn't have one until after the next Comprehensive Plan Update meeting, <br /> where this particular piece of property was going to be discussed in regards to its fit in the <br /> overall Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Chairperson Peterson told the Commission one of the comments the citizens have been <br /> making at the community meetings concerning the Comprehensive Plan Update is they <br /> have no interest in having any more commercial businesses along County Road I. The <br /> citizens are saying that nobody should be forced out of their homes on Highway 10 to <br /> accommodate more commercial business. <br /> The question was posed to each of the Commissioners: Do you have any strong feelings <br /> one way or the other in regards to the Walgreen Development location? <br /> Commissioner Obert said that the development would be in the Highway 10 corridor, as <br /> the citizens have requested, and he tended to be in favor of the location. <br /> Commissioner Johnston agreed and added that making Eastwood a cul-de-sac would <br /> improve the traffic conditions of the area. <br /> • Commissioner Brasaemle told the Commission at this time he does not have strong <br /> feelings about the issue. He said he needed more time and more information in order to <br /> form a sound opinion. <br /> Director Jopke asked the Commission if there is some information that the staff could <br /> provide to make the issue more clear. <br /> Commissioner Brasaemle requested the County's traffic information on County Road I. <br /> - -- • - • - ' - <br /> of the affected properties. <br /> Associate Ericson reminded the Commission the next Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> meeting is scheduled for March 11, 1998, to be held at the Edgewood School. The focus <br /> will be on District No. 2. <br /> Chairperson Peterson stated three agenda items for the next Planning Commission <br /> meeting: <br /> 1. Property value appraisal <br /> • 2. <br /> 3. Traffic issues <br /> livability of the development area <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.