Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission February 18, 1998 <br /> • Special Meeting Page 4 <br /> Chairperson Peterson asked if there is a unified front on the Anoka County Airport <br /> Development. <br /> Mr. Morrish said there would be problems, this being one of the major ones for this <br /> Coalition Group. It is the challenge to the group to solve the problem so that all <br /> participants can get some benefit from the development. <br /> Commissioner Obert stated the Coalition would be a good opportunity for the <br /> communities to apply some needed pressure on the Met Council as a way to get the ball <br /> rolling on some projects. <br /> Warren Johnson, 7710 Greenwood, asked who chose Mounds View as a pilot area for <br /> the Coalition program. <br /> Mr. Morrish told Johnson the Mayor and city administrators were already working <br /> together, and the Mayors Association had been formative in getting the City of Mounds <br /> View involved in the process. <br /> • 5. <br /> Planning Case No. 513-98 <br /> 8265 Spring Lake Road <br /> Applicant: Preferred Builders, Inc. <br /> Consideration of Resolution No. 532-98, Approving a 7-Foot Variance to the Required 30-Foot <br /> Front-Yard Setback. <br /> The applicant, Darryl Westerlund was present. <br /> eve I organ, • oun•s view - •u •- • , _. •- - • , -- • ; • '- <br /> background <br /> _background on the proposed development: <br /> In 1996 the Mounds View EDA acquired a lot at the above address through the Housing <br /> Replacement Program. At that time a 20-foot variance was applied for and granted to <br /> deal with the property's 80-foot width and the City's 100-foot-frontage requirement. <br /> On January 30, 1998, the EDA sold the property to Preferred Builders. As part of the <br /> purchase agreement Preferred Builders was required to build a minimum three bedroom, <br /> two bathroom home with an attached two car garage. The home proposed by Preferred <br /> Builders meets all of the City's requirements with the exception that the house is 7 feet <br /> • wider than the code allows. This width difference is due to the house having a three car <br /> attached garage instead of a two car attached garage. The owner is asking for a 7-foot <br /> variance to resolve the problem. <br />