My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-04-1998 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
03-04-1998 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:03:16 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:03:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
3/4/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Mounds View planning Commission March 4, 1998 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> 4. <br /> Planning Case No. 513-98 <br /> 8265 Spring Lake Road <br /> Applicant: Preferred Builders, Inc. <br /> Consideration of Resolution No. 532-98, Approving a 7-foot Variance to the Required 30-foot <br /> Front-Yard Setback. <br /> The applicant, Preferred Builders, Inc., was present. <br /> Inspector Dorgan referred to the February 27, 1998 Planning Commission Memo which <br /> reminded the Commission Members that on February 18, 1998, the Commission tabled the <br /> Variance Request by Preferred Builders in order to allow the staff to get an opinion from <br /> the City Attorney in regards to language that was contained in the purchase agreement <br /> that Preferred Builders had with the EDA for the proposed property. <br /> Staff asked the City Attorney the following question: Is the City obligated to provide a <br /> • variance for the Developer to build the Minimum Improvements it desires to construct? <br /> The City Attorney responded: "The basic answer is no, since the EDA cannot generally <br /> obligate the City to grant a variance." <br /> "Likewise, pursuant to the Agreement, if a variance is necessary, it is the Developer's <br /> obligation to obtain all necessary permits, etc. for the construction of the Minimum <br /> Improvements. If the Developer can show some type of hardship (whatever that may be), <br /> a variance may then be applied for at the request of the Developer, but the Agreement <br /> itself does not require the granting of a variance. Such request would be independent of <br /> the Agreement and, pursuant to City Code, the burden of sustaining such request would <br /> be that of the Developer." <br /> Chairperson Peterson returned the floor to the Commission for questions and comments. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson asked if the proposed plan had been reworked to allow for the <br /> alternate four-foot variance as had been proposed at the Planning Commission Special <br /> Meeting held February 18, 1998. <br /> Darryl Westerlund, representing Preferred Builders, responded by saying the original <br /> garage width of 32' could be down sized to 28', with all of the width reduction coming <br /> out of the large garage door opening. He added the depth of the garage and the body of <br /> • the house would remain the same. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.