Laserfiche WebLink
• Mounds View Planning Commission March 18, 1998 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> 4. Approval of Minutes <br /> A. February 4, 1998 (Regular) <br /> B. February 18, 1998 (Special) <br /> Motion/Second: Stevenson/Brooks to approve the February 4, 1998 (Regular)and February 18, <br /> 1998 (Special)meeting minutes as corrected. <br /> Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 <br /> 5. <br /> Planning Case No. 513-98 <br /> 8265 Spring Lake Road <br /> Applicant: Preferred Builders,Inc. <br /> Consideration of Resolution No. 532-98, Approving a Four Foot Variance to the Required 30-foot <br /> Front Yard Setback. <br /> 4111 The applicant, Preferred Builders, Inc. was present. <br /> Inspector Dorgan reviewed the Planning Commission Memo dated March 18, 1998. At <br /> the March 4, 1998 Planning Commission regular meeting the Commission tabled the first <br /> version of Planning Case 513-98, a variance request to deny a seven-foot variance to the <br /> Required 30-foot front-yard setback. City staff had indicated the need for the additional <br /> time to draft a variance that reflected the builder's compromise to allow for a four-foot <br /> variance to the required 30-foot front yard setback. <br /> Formal action was requested on the variance request so the City would be in compliance <br /> with Minnesota State Statues that specify formal action within a 60-day time period. <br /> Chairperson Peterson turned the floor over to the applicant for his comments. <br /> Darryl Westerlund, representative for Preferred Builders, Inc., introduced the <br /> Commission to Bruce Fulcan, the independent home designer that Preferred Builders uses <br /> to design their house plans. Mr. Westerlund said much time and effort had been expended <br /> trying to come up with a workable house plan or rework the proposed plan for the property <br /> in question. To date, the designer has had no luck in this process. <br /> Mr. Westerlund told the Commission Preferred Builders would be willing to build a <br /> • smaller home on the lot, but this would take an amendment to the purchase agreement as it <br /> now is written. <br />