My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-06-1998 PC
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
05-06-1998 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:10:12 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:10:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
5/6/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Mounds View Planning Commission May 6, 1998 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> No discussion was held. <br /> Motion/Second: Stevenson/Brasaemle to approve the March 18, 1998 (Special) meeting minutes <br /> and the April 1, 1998 (Regular) meeting minutes as corrected. <br /> Ayes - 6 Nays - 0 <br /> The motion carried. <br /> Chairperson Peterson directed the Commission's attention to Commissioner Johnston's <br /> letter of resignation from the Mounds View Planning Commission. <br /> 5. <br /> Planning Case No. 523-98 <br /> 2200 Highway 10 <br /> Applicant: Mermaid Inc., (Dan Hall) <br /> Consideration of Resolution No. 546-98 Approving a Development Request for a Bowling alley <br /> Expansion. <br /> • <br /> The applicant, Mermaid Inc., (Dan Hall), was present. <br /> Associate Ericson made his presentation as follows: <br /> The owner of the Mermaid Bowling Alley is requesting permission to add eight new <br /> bowling lanes to the north side of the existing facility at 2200 Highway 10. The site is <br /> currently, and inappropriately, zoned B-3. <br /> The addition would consist of 7,825 square feet which would necessitate the construction <br /> of 40 additional parking spaces. <br /> There is no additional runoff expected from the development, although the Rice Creek <br /> Watershed District will need to review the development proposal and issue a watershed <br /> permit before construction can begin. <br /> There are 505 parking spaces proposed by the developer. The required number, including <br /> the new addition, would be 482, thus parking requirements will be met. One problem that <br /> was discussed was the parking stalls, as shown on the proposal drawings, were <br /> dimensioned at 9'x18' instead of the required 9'x20'. The shorter 9'x18' parking stalls have <br /> • been allowed only for perimeter parking where an overhang of the car into greenspace <br /> may occur. These allowances, however, have been allowed as part of a PUD. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.