Laserfiche WebLink
• Mounds View Planning Commission June 17, 1998 <br /> Special Meeting Page 3 <br /> movement. The City Engineer and Rice Creek Watershed have given the project their <br /> approval. The PUD requires a minimum of 89 parking stalls. The plan as proposed shows <br /> 123 parking stalls: 25 stalls in the front of the building (four being handicap accessible) <br /> and 78 parking stalls inside the building. The exterior parking significantly encroaches <br /> into the required front setback of the property. The approved setback is 30 feet. The <br /> plans show the parking lot at 10 feet. The building itself encroaches four feet into the <br /> approved 27-foot setback, which has necessitated the PUD amendment. Item 5 of the <br /> PUD document would need to be revised to show a 23-foot building setback. No changes <br /> were proposed or needed in regards to utilities. The Fire Marshal has reviewed the <br /> revised plans and has indicated that a fire hydrant will need to be installed on the east side <br /> of Silver Lake Road. The landscape plan is acceptable with one exception: City Forester <br /> Wriskey has recommended substituting Red Splendor Crab trees for the Radiant Crabs, <br /> which are susceptible to disease in the summer months. The only change in regards to <br /> building access has been the elimination of access by an internal private driveway. The <br /> lighting plan, as submitted, is in compliance with City Code. The light stand height is 15 <br /> feet and the foot candles fall within the required range. <br /> • A stipulation will need to be added to the site plan resolution, No. 553-98, requiring the <br /> addition of the recommended fire hydrant. <br /> The Commission was charged with deciding if the proposed setbacks were acceptable. <br /> Specifically to review if more spacing between the property lines and the parking lot was <br /> needed. <br /> Staff is recommending approval of Resolution Nos. 552-98 and 553-98. <br /> Dick Hanson,Realife of Mounds View Inc., gave his presentation as follows: <br /> Realife Inc., has been developing senior cooperative housing since 1978. They currently <br /> have developments in Edina, Burnsville, Eden Prairie, and Brooklyn Park. All buildings <br /> are operated under the same cooperative ownership approach. A senior, 62 and over, <br /> buys a share of the cooperative for a predetermined amount of money. The share entitles <br /> the owner apartment rental privileges, property tax benefits, and mortgage interest <br /> benefits just as they would in conventional home ownership. -A management consultant, <br /> usually Realife Inc., is hired to help run the day-to-day operations of the facility. <br /> The rent from the apartments goes to cover the building mortgage, maintenance funds, <br /> and property tax fund. A board of directors is established from within the residents to <br /> oversee the management of the building. Only the board of directors can authorize an <br /> • increase in the rental fees. Hanson stated, "Historically, rent increases have been held to a <br />