12-02-1998 PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• Mounds View Planning Commission December 2, 1998 Regular Meeting Page 5 the theater building only. The parking lot has been paved and striped and access points have been stubbed into both Highway 10 and Donatelles. The access to County Road H2 has been installed completely. Because of the multiple uses and potential for multiple ownership entities, a platting of the theater site, which encompasses approximately 25 acres, is required. Per City Code, copies of the plat have been sent to Ramsey County, the City Attorney, the City Engineer, the Director of Public Works, and the Rice Creek Watershed District for approval under these organization's various disciplines. The City Code also requires a park dedication either in land or a cash payment in lieu of land. Anthony Properties has indicated they will pay the required ten percent of the property's $1,032,500 value. A public hearing has been scheduled for the City Council meeting to be held December 14, 1998. Staff was recommending approval of Planning Commission resolution No. 564-98, a resolution recommending to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat for the Anthony Properties Addition, with stipulations as stated in the staff report dated December 2, 1998. Miller suggested including in the Resolution that the resolution was forwarded to the Council before the adoption of the minutes. Ericson indicated he would add the "standard" clause to the resolution. Brasaemle stated the wetland acreage was included with the theater acreage, and that the reason the parking lot was separate from the theaters was because of the public right-of-way issue. Ericson confirmed Brasaemle's statements. Stevenson asked Ericson to read Wendell Smith's written comments into the record. Ericson read the letter as follows into the record: "As I mentioned to you,I will be unable to attend the Planning Commission meeting on December 2, 1998,as I will be out of town on business. However,I will be able to attend the Council meeting on December 14. I believe that what we are asking in this subdivision is exactly what we have shown on all of our drawings that have been approved previously by the Planning Commission and the City Council. What will be before the Planning Commission is to formally approve what has been approved in the past. I would ask,that if the Planning Commission does deny our request for this subdivision,that • we have the opportunity of moving on to the Council for their vote."