Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission December 16, 1998 <br /> Special Meeting Page 3 <br /> • <br /> revised landscape plan in the event that any of the species have been recently found to be <br /> susceptible to disease or any other problems. <br /> The access and drive aisles are in conformance with Fire Department requirements and standards. <br /> Because of the angled loading bays at the rear of the building, truck traffic will enter only from the <br /> north driveway and exit only from the south driveway. There is 45 feet of impervious surface at <br /> the rear of the building to sufficiently accommodate the turning and maneuvering of the trucks. <br /> The building will tie into existing watermains and sanitary sewer service. The Fire Marshall has <br /> been sent a copy of the utility plan to verify location and number of fire hydrants available for the <br /> site and building. <br /> Ericson told the Planning Commission of an issue raised earlier in the day by the City Engineer <br /> and Director of Public Works regarding the south driveway for the development. It was <br /> suggested that Clifton Drive be extended into the Building N and Mounds View Inn properties to <br /> eliminate a possible point of traffic conflict. The driveways for the use mentioned are within <br /> twenty feet of each other and are directly across from Clifton Drive. <br /> Tim Nelson, representing Everest Group, told the Commission that Everest does not have a <br /> • tenant for the planned building. The design of the building gives Everest the flexibility it needs to <br /> accommodate several types of end users. Several photographs of existing buildings were offered <br /> to give the Commission an idea of what the proposed structure would look like. Several reports <br /> were offered that gave occupancy information for the type of building that is being proposed. <br /> Peterson clarified the fact that the building's interior finishes would not be completed at the time <br /> an occupant was signed. Nelson concurred with Peterson's comments. <br /> Nelson said Everest is asking for approval of the "plan" so that they have the flexibility of either <br /> building the previously approved office/warehouse building or the building that is before the <br /> Commission tonight Construction would begin spring of 1999,Nelson added <br /> Nelson said the idea of the extension of Clifton and redoing the driveway connection at the <br /> southwest corner of the site was a new issue and would be addressed after being analyzed by <br /> Everest staff. Nelson did say that the extension seemed problematic from the standpoint that <br /> Everest has spent a lot of time developing the alternate building and companion engineering plans. <br /> Nelson said Everest would like to keep traffic from the Mounds Inn and this site as far away from <br /> each other as possible. Peak hours in the mornings would see traffic coming into the Everest site <br /> and peak hours in the afternoon would see traffic leaving, which is just the opposite of the motel <br /> traffic pattern. Nelson said Everest would be willing to supply the appropriate signing for the <br /> streets in order to minimize traffic congestion. The plat has already been approved combining <br /> • four existing legal parcels into one for the proposed site. Filing has not taken place on this yet <br /> because of the substantial park dedication fee that goes with development of the site. <br />