My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-16-1998 PC
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
12-16-1998 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:21:00 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:20:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
12/16/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission December 16, 1998 <br /> Special Meeting Page 7 <br /> removing the old driveway and putting in a new driveway? Or is it just simple maintenance and <br /> repair, Ericson asked. <br /> Miller said in the City's other Codes that apply to conditions that are destroyed more than 50 <br /> percent, those situations have to be brought up to code. Tobias'two curb cuts are <br /> nonconforming and you aren't bringing it up to code by fixing it up. <br /> Riggs said the easiest way to read the Code is that Tobias' situation was a destruction and would <br /> cease the nonconformity at that point in time. The cities that have been used for comparison have <br /> a little better definition of what a "damage and destruction" is, Riggs said. <br /> Peterson recommended considering the curb cut issue separate from the driveway replacement <br /> issue. The Commission concurred. <br /> Ulrich said his only concern with Tobias' situation is how close his driveway is to the intersection <br /> and the safety issue involved with Tobias backing out of his driveway into heavy traffic <br /> conditions. Johnson said he would not be in favor of changing the ordinance because of the <br /> precedent it would set. It invites other residents to request variances because of some situation <br /> that is not allowed by Code. Peterson asked if there were setback requirements for a driveway to <br /> • a corner. The Code stipulates 50' in either direction of an intersection, Ulrich added. <br /> Brasaemle said it was his opinion that the Council should decide on this variance request based on <br /> the merits of the particular case. If the City needs to revisit the Code, that should be done in a <br /> more research orientated approach rather than making the Code change based on this one case. <br /> Koopmeiners stated in all of his years working for the Police Department he had never seen an <br /> accident that involved a two-curb-cut lot. <br /> Peterson closed the public hearing. <br /> Motion/Second: Brasaemle/Stevenson to inform the City Council that after considering testimony <br /> at the public hearing, it is the opinion of the Planning Commission that Chapter 1121 of the <br /> Mounds View City Code(Off-Street Parking Requirements)Regarding Multiple Curb Cuts on <br /> corner Lots within Single Family Residential Districts, should stand "as is." <br /> Ayes- 6 Nays- 0 The motion carried. <br /> The Commission directed staff to gather information on what constitutes repair work and what <br /> constitutes replacement work in regard to residential driveways in the City of Mounds View. This <br /> would include criteria for different types of building and all applicable setback issues. The <br /> • information can be presented to the Commission at a later Planning Commission Meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.