Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission February 17, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> • <br /> 5. Approval of Minutes <br /> a. January 6, 1999 <br /> Chairperson Peterson informed the new commissioners of the procedures of reviewing and <br /> acting on minutes. He noted that there were two minor typographical changes. Stevenson made <br /> a motion to approve the minutes as amended. However, since five votes would be needed to <br /> approve the minutes, and several of the new commissioners were not comfortable with approving <br /> the minutes without reviewing them, Commissioner Stevenson withdrew his motion. After <br /> further discussion, Commissioner Stevenson made a new motion to table the minutes until all <br /> members had had a chance to review them. <br /> Motion/Second: Stevenson/Johnson to table approval of the minutes. <br /> Ayes - 9 Nays - 0 <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 111 <br /> 6. <br /> Planning Case No. 546-99 <br /> 8100 Long Lake Road <br /> Consideration of Resolution No. 571-99, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Conditional <br /> use Permit for an Oversized Accessory Building. <br /> Applicant: Richard Maki <br /> The applicant, Richard Maki, was present. <br /> Associate Ericson reviewed this case informing the Commission that this conditional use permit <br /> (CUP) request is for a garage expansion. Since the Code currently allows 952 square feet and <br /> the request for 980 square feet, a CUP is required. He added that even if the garage were within <br /> the allowable square footage, the garage could not be larger than the house without a CUP. Mr. <br /> Ericson noted that this type of request is probably the most common CUP request received. He <br /> continued by informing the Commission that the property in question is located on Long Lake <br /> Road and Sherwood Road and is 13,700 square feet. He noted that the house is 576 square feet <br /> and that the garage, at present, is smaller than the house. He expressed that one of the concerns <br /> is that the expansion would create a garage about one and a half times as large, close to 70 <br /> percent larger than the house. He added that the basis for this request was so that the property <br /> • owner could store vehicles inside the garage rather than having them outside. <br />