My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-1990 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
04-17-1990 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:26:03 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:26:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
4/17/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 7, 1999 <br /> • Regular Meeting Page 12 <br /> to provide income for the City. He stated the City would have a lot of control over sign content <br /> and he hopes the City would use funds for more than just the golf course. He stated he has signs <br /> on his building downtown and knows they are a good source of income. <br /> Hammerschmidt reviewed the standing City policy which already regulates sign content. He <br /> stated the minimum income received by the City would be $1,000 per sign per month. He advised <br /> that the bond regulations may indicate that any income generated at the golf course needs to stay <br /> with the golf course but that could be researched. <br /> Braathen pointed out that another need is to provide advertisement for the golf course itself. <br /> Hammerschmidt stated this is correct and noted this income stream requires no capital outlay. <br /> Commissioner Miller asked if federal funds were used with the construction of the highway. <br /> Hammerschmidt advised a State permit is required but not a federal permit. <br /> Michael Cronin, representing Eller Media, advised that a State and Federal permit needs to be <br /> obtained and maximum guidelines are established. Also, the property needs to be zoned for <br /> commercial or industrial uses. <br /> • Chair Peterson stated he considers billboards as a blight but there may be some situations where <br /> they are not as obtrusive. He stated that as a golfer the last thing he wants to see is a large <br /> advertisement billboard. Chair Peterson stated that when advertising the course, smaller <br /> monument signs are usually used rather than a large billboard. <br /> Hammerschmidt advised of three locations where the billboard would aid in blocking golf balls <br /> from adjacent property. Chair Peterson asked if a motorist has been hit by a golf ball. <br /> Hammerschmidt stated a vehicle has been hit and this is a concern. He reviewed how liability is <br /> determined in such a case. <br /> Commissioner Hegland asked if negative impacts have been researched. Hammerschmidt stated <br /> the course is so full of golfers that this is probably not an issue. He pointed out that the face of <br /> the billboard will face the freeway, not the golf course, and they will be placed into the wooded <br /> area, where possible, and landscaped. Hammerschmidt stated the policy can contain recourse <br /> should an objectionable sign be placed. <br /> Mr. Cronin reviewed their experience with these concerns and assured the Commission they can <br /> be addressed by prohibiting the advertisement of any age-restricted goods, political issues, etc. <br /> He stated if they are told to remove a billboard, it is done within three days. Mr. Cronin <br /> suggested that one person within the City have the authority to request the sign be removed. He <br /> advised this may impact the"richness" of the bids but would provide protection. Mr. Cronin <br /> • stated the actual sign structure could also be reconsidered. <br /> Mr. Dean explained the sign needs to high enough so it can be read from the freeway. Mr. Cronin <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.