My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-17-1990 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
04-17-1990 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:26:03 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:26:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
4/17/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 7, 1999 <br /> • Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> front setback of her property, which is located at 7805 Gloria Circle. This lot is one of the few <br /> lots in the City which border Spring Lake, the City's only natural lake. The Zoning Code <br /> prohibits the construction of a garage or any accessory building in the front yard of a residential <br /> property. The front yard, as is defined by the Code, is that area between the front line of the <br /> principal structure (house) and the front property line. <br /> Ericson advised it is proposed to turn the existing attached single family garage into living space. <br /> However, if the Code requirements were followed to a"T," it would place the garage between the <br /> house and lake. He explained that because homes on lake lots are typically oriented toward the <br /> lake, many communities offer a provision for allowing a garage between the home and the street, <br /> as it would be undesirable to construct the garage between the house and the lake. There are six <br /> lots in the City where this becomes an issue, and 7805 Gloria Circle is one of those lots. <br /> He reviewed his analysis of other city's codes and the seven criteria established for consideration <br /> of a variance, noting a variance may only be granted in those cases where the Code imposes <br /> undue hardship or practical difficulties to the property owner. Ericson indicated staff believes that <br /> a case can be made for the existence of a hardship with regard to the applicant's request. <br /> However, because it is not clear that all of the criteria can be met, the undue hardship requirement <br /> • may not be satisfied. Ericson noted the water feature is important to this property. <br /> Ericson referred to a recent Code Amendment passed by Roseville which allows garages and <br /> other accessory structures in"front yards" of lake lots. Ericson went on to explain that there are <br /> provisions in the Mounds View Code to permit building expansion and location of accessory <br /> buildings within the buffer area. The intent is that this area should remain in an undeveloped state <br /> to protect and preserve the impacted water feature. In situations where the Code does not <br /> anticipate a given situation or cannot be applied to a specific property for reasons of undue <br /> hardship or through practical difficulties, there are two courses of action to remedy the situation: <br /> the property owner can request a variance or request an amendment to the City Code. Ericson <br /> advised that amending the Code would be done only in the event that a mistake was made in the <br /> Code's original construction, discovery of a situation or condition which was not originally <br /> anticipated, or because changing community standards over time warrant such a change. Because <br /> there are only six properties in the City to which this condition would apply, amending the Code <br /> would not be appropriate. <br /> Chair Peterson opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. <br /> Dorothee Dietrich, 7805 Gloria Circle, applicant, advised that the impervious blacktop area of <br /> about 50 feet by 25 feet will be removed and the garage built in that location, resulting in less <br /> impervious surface than currently exists. <br /> Commissioner Stevenson asked if the actual garage placement will be considered. Ericson stated <br /> when the building permit is considered, if the variance is approved, staff will assure the garage <br /> placement meets the stated requirements including the setback distances of a Single Family <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.