My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-21-1999 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
04-21-1999 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:27:06 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:27:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
4/21/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission April 21, 1999 <br /> • Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> to be more conducive of redevelopment and reutilization of properties. He noted that if the Code <br /> is amended, there would be no hardship because it would be allowed and not need a variance. <br /> Chair Peterson stated if a Code amendment is considered, it would have to be carefully written to <br /> assure setback distances are maintained. In this case, he stated he sees no other alternatives and <br /> believes it would be unreasonable to refuse to allow the property owner to expand. <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Hegland/Kaden to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 574-99, a <br /> resolution approving a variance to allow the required five-foot side yard setback for principal <br /> structure living space located at 5302 Raymond Avenue, Mounds View Planning Case No. 550- <br /> 99. <br /> Commissioner Miller requested a correction to the fourth WHEREAS on Page 2 of the resolution <br /> to eliminate one of the words "not" from the first line. She restated that she does not believe the <br /> criteria have all been met so she will vote against. <br /> Chair Peterson requested that additional qualifying language be added to the resolution to clarify <br /> the unique situation. Ericson suggested that staff strengthen the language to indicate that <br /> • alternatives to expansion are very limited. <br /> inas follows: "In that the lot is only100 feet wide and supports two <br /> Ericson suggested wording pp <br /> building units, and given the context of the building design which makes building expansion overly <br /> restrictive." <br /> Hegland/Kaden agreed with these friendly amendments to the motion. <br /> Ayes - 7 Nays - 1 The motion carried. <br /> 8. Staff Reports /Items of Information <br /> A. Review of Council Actions <br /> Community Development Director Jopke updated the Planning Commission regarding recent <br /> Council and EDA discussions on a proposed TIF office/warehouse development and continuing <br /> discussion regarding that project. He stated that depending on the next EDA discussion, that <br /> development may or may not move forward. <br /> Jopke reviewed the survey which was recently conducted regarding the disposition of a remnant <br /> parcel that will be created when Edgewood is realigned. He noted the responses received with <br /> the clear majority supporting the City to keep it and do nothing with it or use it for a storm water <br /> 411 pond. Jopke advised that the Council was concerned with the low number of responses and asked <br /> staff to get more citizen input from an over-all community survey. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.