Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 21, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> • <br /> 3. Citizens' Requests and Comments on Items Not on the Agenda <br /> No citizen requests or comments on items not on the agenda were considered. <br /> 4. Approval of Minutes <br /> A. March 17, 1999 <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Berke/Hegland to approve the March 17, 1999 meeting minutes as <br /> presented. <br /> Ayes - 8 Nays - 0 The motion carried. <br /> 5. Planning Case No. 552-99 [Public Hearing] <br /> Property Involved: 2091 Terrace Drive <br /> Consideration of Planning Commission Resolution 578-99, a Resolution Recommending <br /> Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for an 1,040 square-foot Over-Sized Garage <br /> • Applicant: Gerald Miller, Property Owner <br /> The applicant was present. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson gave the staff report as follows: <br /> The applicant, Gerald Miller, is requesting a conditional use permit (CUP) to construct a 1,040 <br /> square-foot garage at 2091 Terrace Drive which is located north of County Road I near the <br /> eastern border of the City. The property, an interior lot, is approximately 13,050 square feet. <br /> . e . A • -- . . . 5 I" 555 $ • 1" • .i h the detached <br /> garage situated behind the house. The house, at approximately 926 square feet, is presently larger <br /> than the existing two-stall garage, which is 506 square feet. The applicant will be removing the <br /> present garage to make room for thenew one. There is an 80 square foot (8 x 10) shed behind <br /> the existing garage which is set far enough back so as not to be in the way of the proposed <br /> garage. <br /> A CUP is required, in this case, due to the size of the proposed garage. The size of the proposed <br /> garage would be 1,040 square feet, which is not much larger than the house. While it would be <br /> larger, there would not exist the "imbalance" which has been present in the last few over-sized <br /> garage CUP requests. The applicant proposes to construct an addition to the rear of the house in <br /> the following year which would again make the house bigger than the garage. The proposed <br /> . location of the garage does not interfere with the future expansion plans nor the existence of a <br /> shed in the back yard. <br />