05-19-1999 PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission May 19, 1999 • Regular Meeting Page 6 Chair Peterson stated that the Surveyor's Certificate indicated there was space behind the garage on the west side and asked what was located there. Ericson stated that there was a bedroom and laundry room in back of the garage which would make that area inaccessible. He reiterated that the south side of the home was also inaccessible and the front did not have the required setback. Chair Peterson stated that this situation would apply to other houses, and they would require the same consideration. Mr. Murlowski stated that this was true, however, the precedent had been set with the first variance that was granted. Commissioner Miller asked from what point the setback was determined when the porch was to be constructed above ground level. Mr. Murlowski stated that it would be measured from the outside wall. • Commissioner Kaden asked in regard to the criteria, if the special circumstances did not result from the actions of the applicant. Mr. Murlowski stated that at this time it was the desire of the homeowner, not a necessity, but that it may be necessary from the standpoint that they may require expansion to remain in the residence. He stated that the house was already 100 percent finished, and if they could not expand, they may have to move. Mike Leon, the applicant, added that his children were now teenagers and they had waited for this opportunity to add on to their home. He stated that they needed more room to accommodate their growing family and that they did not wish to move. Commissioner Braathen stated that the hardship was created in 1985 when the City allowed re- subdivision of the property. He stated that he supports granting the variance. Commissioner Hegland agreed. He stated, however, that he had concerns about setting a precedent and the possibility of creating a situation that may impose upon the neighbors. Chair Peterson stated that the matter was just up for consideration and there was no clear direction for staff. He stated that he did not believe there would be a negative impact on the neighbors to the north or otherwise, and added that he thought this would be a desirable improvement. He stated that the placement of the structure on the lot did not allow for expansion, and that this lot was not unique within this neighborhood. • Mr. Murlowski stated that a typical twin-home has a split entry with a patio door and deck off the back.