Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission July 7, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 11 <br /> foot setback from the street. He stated that, at the time this property was constructed, this was not <br /> a consideration. Chair Peterson noted that the lot appeared to be substandard by current corner lot <br /> requirements. <br /> Commissioner Hegland asked what was located to the north of the applicant's property. Mr. Gregori <br /> stated that there was an apartment complex to the north. Commissioner Hegland stated that this was <br /> a good proposal, and that he understood what the applicant was trying to accomplish. He stated his <br /> support for the proposal. <br /> Commissioner Kaden stated that he did not think eleven feet would be much worse than fifteen feet, <br /> noting that he had seen many garages offset behind houses. He offered however, that in his opinion, <br /> and for aesthetic purposes, it would look better if it was not. Mr. Gregori stated that, instead of <br /> eleven feet, a twelve-foot setback would place the end of the garage along the side of the existing <br /> sidewalk. He stated that this would require less concrete work for the sidewalk and driveway, and <br /> added that the edge of the garage would align with the edge of the sidewalk, where it intersects with <br /> the driveway. He stated that he had originally wanted the additional foot for clearance purposes, so <br /> that the garage would not be so close to the house and steps. Chair Peterson stated that this seemed <br /> • to be a reasonable compromise. He stated that there was an apparent hardship in regard to the <br /> placement of the house on the lot, as well as the probability of the lot being undersized by current <br /> corner lot standards. <br /> Commissioner Johnson requested that the applicant clarify if he was requesting an eleven or twelve <br /> foot setback. Mr. Gregori stated that a twelve-foot setback would be acceptable, but eleven feet <br /> would be ideal for his purposes. <br /> Commissioner Braathen stated that he had seen the property, and could see the logic in the applicant's <br /> proposal. Commissioners Berke and Johnson concurred and indicated their support as well. <br /> Commissioner Miller stated that she had also seen the property, and wondered how a two-car garage <br /> could fit in that area. Mr. Gregori explained that by aligning the garage with the driveway it would <br /> go further west. He added that most of the garage area to the west would not be for parking, but that <br /> there would be a service door for ingress and egress, which would face south. Mr. Gregori stated <br /> that he had not anticipated these complications when he purchased the property. He stated that his <br /> intention was to build the garage to match the existing structure, and added that the pitch of the roof <br /> would be the same as that of the house, and that it would be sided with the same material. <br /> Chair Peterson stated that it appeared that the consensus of the Commission was to allow an eleven- <br /> foot setback. <br /> Chair Peterson opened the Public Hearing at 8:10 p.m. <br /> Hearing no comments from the floor, Chair Peterson closed the Public Hearing at 8:11 p.m. <br />