My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-07-1999 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
07-07-1999 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:31:52 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:31:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
7/7/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution 587-99 <br /> Gregori Variance <br /> July 7, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 Of the Mounds View Municipal <br /> Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be <br /> satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission <br /> finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br /> Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient hardship with regard to the property <br /> located at 2801 Woodale Drive to warrant the approval of a variance to Michael and Christine <br /> Gregory for the construction of a 672 square-foot garage eleven feet from the property line, and <br /> makes the following findings of fact related to its decision: <br /> 1. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to 2801 Woodale Drive which do not <br /> apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity in that the house and <br /> garage were built in 1953, predating the City's zoning code by seven years. <br /> 2. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of <br /> rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this <br /> • Title in that multiple car garages are common features in this district and serve as a <br /> physical improvement to properties. <br /> 3. The variance request is the result of factors over which the applicants had no control. The <br /> house and garage were constructed in such a way that made the garage non-conforming <br /> with the advent of the City's Zoning Code. <br /> 4. Granting a variance to allow a two-car garage in the same location as the existing single- <br /> stall garage, without further encroaching into the setback, would not be a special privilege. <br /> Multiple-car garages are standard residential features while single stall-garages are <br /> becoming functionally obsolete. <br /> 5. The Planning Commission finds that an eleven-foot setback is the minimum variance that <br /> would alleviate the applicant's hardship. <br /> 6. The purpose of the variance provision in the Code is to give relief to property owners <br /> seeking to improve their properties yet are unable to do so because of zoning code <br /> requirements and factors beyond their control. Granting this variance for a two-car garage <br /> utilizing the same setback as the existing garage would not be materially detrimental to the <br /> purpose of this Title or to other property in the same zone. <br /> • 7. A 672 square-foot garage set back eleven feet from the Silver Lake Road right of way <br /> would not impair a supply of light or increase congestion, nor would it increase the danger <br /> of fire or endanger the public safety or diminish property values. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.