My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-07-1999 PC
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
07-07-1999 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2018 5:31:52 AM
Creation date
7/27/2018 5:31:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV City Council
City Council Document Type
City Council Minutes
Date
7/7/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
111 Mounds View Planning Commission July 7, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> Commissioner Miller asked what plans the applicant had for snow removal. Mr. Winslow stated that <br /> they had four-by-four trucks and a plow in their fleet. He stated that they could dedicate a truck for <br /> the purpose of snow removal and do the maintenance themselves. Commissioner Miller asked where <br /> the snow would be placed. Ericson stated that previous owners of the site had designated areas on <br /> the property for snow storage, and added that the applicant could indicate the snow storage location <br /> on the site plan. <br /> Commissioner Hegland asked if the applicant had any intention of expanding the paved area to <br /> increase the parking capacity in the back of the property, noting that it appeared that there was room <br /> to expand in that area, and that this would be the time to address that issue. Mr. Winslow stated that <br /> both he and co-applicant Dave Besonen had concentrated on the site and location, without examining <br /> the details of the parking situation, but that he was agreeable to looking into the issue at this time. <br /> Chair Peterson requested clarification to the location of a fence in back of the parking lot, in <br /> relationship to the property lines. Ericson as stated that the fence was located a good distance from <br /> the property line. He stated that there was some treed area behind the building, and the fence was <br /> located closer to the building so as not to interfere with the trees. Mr. Winslow stated that this might <br /> provide an option to the parking requirements, and that they would look into it further. <br /> Commissioner Kaden stated that he would like to see some additional landscaping at the location. <br /> Chair Peterson stated that the evergreen trees originally planted by the previous applicant were <br /> smaller in size than the City had requested. Ericson stated that the trees were not only small, but they <br /> had not been well attended, and appeared to be in poor health. Commissioner Kaden suggested that <br /> the applicant consult with the City Forester regarding which type of plantings do well in this area. <br /> Chair Peterson explained that the City Forester has provided assistance with hardiness issues, and low <br /> maintenance types of plantings that are also attractive in the past. He stated that the applicant could <br /> discuss the landscaping issues with staff and the City Forester to determine an economical and <br /> attractive landscaping plan. <br /> Dave Besonen, co-applicant representing Thrifty Car Rental, stated that he was the manager of the <br /> business' off-airport locations. He stated that he managed a lot in downtown Minneapolis which had <br /> only four parking spaces, and that he had no trouble keeping cars off of that lot. He stated that they <br /> would be servicing some of the automobiles on site, for minor repairs such as oil changes, fixing <br /> headlights, and replacing windshield wipers. He stated that this would only be for their automobiles, <br /> and not the public's. <br /> Mr. Besonen asked what would be allowable in terms of indicating that they had cars for sale. <br /> Ericson stated that any type of permanent signage advertising the sale of automobiles should not be <br /> allowed. He stated that sales was considered strictly an accessory use, and to allow signage might <br /> categorize it as part of the principal use, which could cause concern among other parties who had <br /> wanted to utilize the property for an auto sales operation. He also addressed the issue of fairness and <br /> legality, and the possibility of violation of the City Zoning Code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.