Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Resolution 588-99 <br /> July 21, 1999 <br /> • Page 2 <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings that possible adverse <br /> effects have been considered in its recommendation, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 1.e.: <br /> 1. Relationship with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of residential areas so as <br /> to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of housing units and residential property in <br /> general. The Comprehensive Plan designates this property, 8059 Red Oak Drive, as low-density <br /> residential. This proposal does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> 2, 4. The Geographical Area Involved & the Character of the Surrounding Area. <br /> In this area of Mounds View, most of the lots are larger than the subject property. The <br /> homes are generally of a similar style architecture and were built around the same time, <br /> although the subject home is newer and is larger than those in the immediate area. Many <br /> of the homes in the immediate area have larger garages, most of which are detached as in <br /> this proposal. A larger garage on the subject property would not appear out of place. <br /> 3. Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br /> • Adding to the existing garage will have an immediate positive impact on the value of the <br /> subject property. At 1,000 square,feet, set back from the street as far as it is, this garage <br /> addition probably would not depreciate the surrounding area in any way. <br /> 5. The demonstrated need for such a use. <br /> The existing garage--while a two stalls--is considered fairly small by today's standards. The <br /> applicants both have vehicles as do their children. In addition, the applicants own a boat which they <br /> would like to have stored within the garage. Clearly the need for additional garage space has been <br /> demonstrated. <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission makes the following findings regarding the criteria <br /> for approval of a conditional use permit, as required by Section 1125.01 Subd. 3.b.: <br /> 1. The use will not create an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other <br /> public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> 7. The use will not cause traffic hazards or congestion. <br /> 8. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and necessary facilities have been or will be provided. <br /> Adding on to a small garage would not create a greater impact on existing public facilities, parks. <br /> schools or services, on utilities or access roads, nor would it create an increase in traffic on <br /> adjacent streets. <br /> • 2. The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent <br /> residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and <br /> there will be no deterrence to development of vacant land. <br /> 3. The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon <br />