Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission August 4, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 22 <br /> stated that it relates to all existing signs within the City that are technically not in conformance with <br /> the ordinance. <br /> Commissioner Kaden inquired if Ramsey County were to allow people to place advertising signs at <br /> this location,would this be permitted under the ordinance. Jopke stated that he did not believe they <br /> could,but reiterated if it was the desire of the Commission to include more limiting language to the <br /> code amendment, it could be done. <br /> Commissioner Laube stated that they could indicate that signage which pertains only to the City. <br /> Commissioner Kaden stated that he did not think this was necessary. He stated, if Ramsey County <br /> desired to erect a sign, such as park identification, he would be agreeable to that, however, definitely <br /> not advertising. Acting Chair Stevenson stated that the language should refer to all of the non- <br /> conforming signs of this type. He inquired if this might be too limiting, and result in having to be <br /> more specific with all other types of non-conforming sign. Jopke stated he did not believe so. He <br /> stated what they were attempting to do with this particular ordinance, is to define what are appropriate <br /> signs in these two specific districts. He stated he thought they could outline specific requirements in <br /> the use regulations. He suggested they include language at the end of each subdivision, to indicate <br /> "the signs shall identify and relate to the activity, which is intended upon the site." <br /> MOTION/SECOND:Laube/Berke. To Approve Resolution No. 592-99, a Resolution Recommending <br /> Approval of Ordinance No. 637; as Amended to Include the Language Following Each Subdivision <br /> to Indicate the Signs Shall Identify and Relate to the Activity Which is Intended upon the Site, an <br /> Ordinance Amending the Chapter 1008 of the Mounds View Municipal Code Pertaining to Permitted <br /> Signage in PF Public Facilities and CRP Conservancy, Recreation, Preservation Zoning Districts; <br /> Planning Case No. SP073-99. <br /> Ayes—7 Nays—0 The motion carried. <br /> 9. Staff Reports /Items of Information <br /> A. Previous Council Action <br /> Community Development Director Jopke reported on City Council action from their meeting on July <br /> 26. He stated there was approval of the oversized garage at 8059 Red Oak Drive. He stated the <br /> Council approved the conditional use permit for Thrifty Car Rental located at 2975 Highway 10, with <br /> stipulations. He stated the applicant would come before the Council and request reconsideration of <br /> a stipulation relating to truck, trailer and recreation vehicle rentals. <br /> Jopke stated there was approval of the conditional use permit for the outdoor produce stand at the <br /> Holiday Stationstore. He stated neighboring residents appeared at the meeting and indicated their <br /> concerns in regard to existing noise problems with the station, and the property owner was currently <br /> working with the residents to resolve these issues. He stated they had the second reading and approval <br /> of the ordinance pertaining to the permitted uses within the B-2 Limited Business District, which <br /> relates to educational and instructional facilities. <br />