08-18-1999 PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission August 18, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 3 Acting Chair Miller inquired if staff had discussed the resolution recommending denial of the request with the applicant. Ericson stated staff has been in contact with the applicant, who is aware that the request faces a recommendation of denial by the Planning Commission. MOTION/SECOND: Laube/Berke. To Approve Resolution No. 590-99, a Resolution Recommending Denial of a Conditional Use Permit For an Oversized Garage at 2809 Woodale Drive; Mounds View Planning Case No. 552-99. Ayes— 5 Nays— 1 (Hegland) The motion carried. Commissioner Hegland stated he did not think the Planning Commission should discourage people from improving their property, and he believed this to be an improvement. 6. Planning Case No. 559-99 Property Involved: 2670 County Road I Consideration of Resolution 584-99, a resolution recommending approval of a conditional use permit for an assisted living senior residential facility; a rezoning ordinance (Ordinance 631); and an • ordinance amending the Zoning Code pertaining to conditional uses within the R-4 Zoning District. Applicant: MSP Real Estate The applicant was present. Planning Associate Ericson gave the staff report as follows: The Planning Commission has discussed this request at several previous meetings. Ericson stated Resolution 584-99 was the result of those many meetings and their discussions, as well as the information provided by members of the Commission, staff and the applicant. • . -I - - ..- - • - .• _ ; approval of the conditional use permit, and adoption of an ordinance approving the rezoning of the property from B-2, Limited Business, to R-4, High Density Residential. He stated another component of the resolution is the recommendation to adopt an ordinance that clarifies the language in Section 1109.04 of the City Code, as it pertains to nursing homes and other similar group housing uses within the R-4 district. He stated this ordinance includes an additional stipulation that the parking for these types of uses shall be examined, and rather than basing this requirement upon that set forth in the City Code, the requirement may be increased depending upon the level and intensity of service being provided. • Ericson stated the applicant has provided a revised site plan, which indicates both entrances to the property to be located on Mounds View Drive. He stated staff has indicated to the applicant that this would probably not be a good situation for people exiting the property onto Mounds View Drive, in