09-15-1999 PC - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission September 15, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 12 . Economic Development Coordinator Carroll stated it was necessary for the Economic Development Commission to determine what their work should be. He explained that in his opinion, and the opinion of a majority of the Economic Development Commission members, they exist not so much to advise the City with regard to residential development, but primarily with the business and industry component, and as this was their purview, it should be reflected in the Economic Development section of the Comprehensive Plan. He suggested if the issue of housing was going to be addressed in the Comprehensive Update, it should be addressed by the Planning Commission, based upon staff's research regarding the City's short and long term residential plans. He added if they were to consider including more of the residential housing issues, this might necessitate changing this section to "Economic and Housing Development Section," and would require they start at the beginning, to determine how much housing development should be incorporated into the document. Economic Development Coordinator Carroll stated he believed there would be a fair amount of housing information in the final Comprehensive Guide Plan update, but the question was where should this information originate. He acknowledged that this was an important topic. Commissioner Berke stated he had brought this forward in light of Tax Increment Financing, and concerns among the residents that it assists the City with their development, but does not necessarily reduce the tax base for the residents. He explained that by increasing the residential development and redevelopment, they are actually providing tax relief to the residents, in that they are producing higher • property taxes, which is of benefit to the residents. Community Development Director Jopke stated ultimately they would have to look at the Comprehensive plan in its entirety, to determine how it reflects the goals and needs of the community. He added he believed it would address this issue. He explained the Housing section addresses the housing issues of the community, and if there are areas that should be emphasized, this can be done, and consolidated into the Plan. Commissioner Hegland inquired if the Comprehensive Plan would weigh the issues of residential versus business and industrial development. He stated he was concerned in that there is a list of the Economic Development Commission's priorities for development, but there are also priorities for residential development, and how would they balance these pi iorities in cost versus benefit analysis to the City. Community Development Director Jopke stated this was a good point. He explained that typically, the Comprehensive Plan is divided into sections, and each of those sections address the goals presented for the City. Commissioner Laube added this document was one division of the Comprehensive Plan, however, it is the entire economic development section, and the Comprehensive Plan and zoning of the City sets the goals. He explained that this section would indicate that economic development is strictly business development, unless some other area of the Comprehensive plan addresses the issue of • residential housing, which is important in the balance of the development of the City as a whole. He