Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 15, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 2 <br /> 111 <br /> 4. Approval of Minutes <br /> A. August 18, 1999 <br /> MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Miller to approve the August 18, 1999 meeting minutes as <br /> corrected. <br /> Ayes— 8 Nays— 0 The motion carried. <br /> 5. Planning Case No. 570-99 <br /> Property Involved: 2075 & 2081 Hillview Road <br /> Consideration of variance request to allow for a zero-foot garage setback. <br /> Applicant: Jeff Johnson <br /> The applicant was present. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson gave the staff report as follows: <br /> i <br /> The applicant, owner of two contiguous properties on Hillview Road, each improved with four-unit <br /> multi-family structures, had desired to construct a six-stall garage structure between the two buildings <br /> to service both buildings. The applicant, since taking over ownership of these two properties, has <br /> invested considerable expense in rehabbing the buildings and making upgrades and improvements. <br /> The addition of a garage structure would without question be beneficial to the property, to its <br /> residents, and to the immediate area. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson explained, if the variance request were to be approved, deed restrictions <br /> would need to be filed, which would apply to the garage structures in the event of fire, or if one or <br /> both of the properties were to be sold in the future. He noted, upon review of the City Attorney, this <br /> approach, although possible, may not be the most appropriate in this situation. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated another possible option for this type of structure would be to <br /> require that the applicant join, or"combine" the two parcels into one parcel. He stated the applicant <br /> has indicated he would be willing to join the properties in lieu of requesting a variance, however, <br /> there are two separate mortgage holders for these properties, and from this standpoint, this approach <br /> might not be possible. He explained, in light of this, the applicant has revised his request to allow a <br /> setback of one-foot for both garage structures, which would result in two separate three-stall garage <br /> structures on each side, separated one-foot from the property line of each structure. He noted there <br /> would be two feet between the buildings to allow for mowing and access to the rear of the properties. <br />