Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission September 15, 1999 <br /> Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> • 6. Planning Case No. 569-99 <br /> Property Involved: 8011 Sunnyside Road <br /> Consideration of Resolution 594-99, a resolution recommending approval of a conditional use permit <br /> for an oversized garage. <br /> Applicant: Donald Mackeben <br /> The applicant was present. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson gave the staff report as follows: <br /> The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct an addition to his garage at 8011 <br /> Sunnyside Road. The existing garage is 720 square feet and does not presently require a Conditional <br /> Use permit, however, the applicant proposes to construct a 320 square foot addition to the rear of <br /> the garage, to be used for a workshop/hobby area. He stated this would create a garage 1,040 square <br /> feet in size, and would therefore require a Conditional Use Permit. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated the exiting house, at approximately 1,400 square feet, is larger than <br /> the garage, even after the proposed expansion. He noted the proposed addition would be located to <br /> • the rear of the garage, and would not be visible from the street, or from two of the adjoining <br /> properties. He noted it would be visible from the property to the south, where it would be seven feet <br /> from the property line. He stated there is a 125-foot space between the addition, and the property <br /> located to the rear, and 100 feet or more to the property line to the north. He stated in terms of <br /> screening and spacing, the proposal meets the requirements. He added the size of the garage is well <br /> within the Code requirements, would not be larger than the house, and does not create extra stalls, <br /> so there would not be any additional traffic going in and out of the structure. <br /> Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has reviewed the general Conditional Use criteria, and these <br /> have all been addressed and satisfied. He explained, in light of this, staff has drafted a resolution, <br /> Resolution 594-99, which recommends to the City Council the approval of this Conditional Use <br /> Permit request. <br /> Commissioner Miller stated she had driven by the property, and was not able to determine the aspects <br /> of the proposal based upon what she had seen. She requested clarification. <br /> Donald Mackeben, the applicant explained he was in the process of demolishing the existing garage. <br /> He noted three to four years prior, snow had caused the garage roof to cave somewhat. He <br /> commented the garage needed new siding and garage doors, and when he obtained estimates to <br /> replace the siding, doors and roof, he determined it would be less expensive to take down the old <br /> garage, and rebuild. He explained the garage would be constructed on the same slab, exactly as it <br /> had been, with the exception of a 6-12 pitch, rather than a 4-12 pitch on the roof, to prevent the <br /> • previous problem from reoccurring. <br />